Public Trails Computed from official land records

Sunshine Coast · Point Perry

Point Perry from First Avenue

entry is a road 15 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class point-perry--from-first-avenue

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from First Avenue, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -26.52477, 153.08932

That is First Avenue, where the walk below begins — 3.7 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-26.52477, 153.08932

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 1306794 nothing mapped 201.1 m 8.9° N Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 1306414 nothing mapped 20.1 m 8.9° N Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 1306072 nothing mapped 181.0 m 8.9° N Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1314128 nothing mapped 29.1 m 44.8° NE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 1604942 Coastal pathway open 96.9 m 351.8° N Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 1604752 Coastal pathway open 41.8 m 44.9° NE Official spatial — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 1309074 nothing mapped 262.9 m 43.8° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 522267 nothing mapped 1339.1 m 127.8° SE Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 522419 nothing mapped 1334.6 m 217.0° SW Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Road reserve 1503938 nothing mapped 148.4 m 123.9° SE Official spatial — evidence class
Total 129.0 m mapped 3655.0 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1604752 and 522267 is 239.34 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1309074 and 522419 is 615.18 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 522267 and 1503938 is 1112.19 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.

Following it on the ground No steps, but the record maps ground here

at least 1½ hours out and back

at least three quarters of an hour there at least three quarters of an hour back

15 m up and 5 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 5 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

What is mapped along this chain

A managing authority has surveyed a way along 129 m of this 3655 m chain — about 4% of it. That is a statement about what is on the ground, not about your right to be there, which the parcels above already settled, and not a direction: no step below is measured along any of these ways.

  • Legs 5–6 Coastal pathway Official spatial — evidence class

    129 m along it · the managing authority publishes it as open to the public (Local Government Authority).

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 3652.2 m · height 5.0 to 20.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
15.0 m
Total descent
5.0 m
Steepest sustained
15.8% over 63.3 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
235.4 m 10.0 m
364.1 m 10.0 m
402.7 m 5.0 m
916.2 m 5.0 m
969.5 m 5.0 m
3538.2 m 5.0 m
3571.6 m 10.0 m
3582.2 m 15.0 m
3634.9 m 20.0 m
3641.4 m 20.0 m
3641.4 m 20.0 m
3652.2 m 20.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 10 legs from First Avenue, 3655.0 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below

    Parcel not resolved, recorded tenure "unresolved". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 1306794 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    201.1 m at 8.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1306794 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 1306414 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.1 m at 8.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1306414 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 1306072 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    181.0 m at 8.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1306072 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1314128 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    29.1 m at 44.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1314128 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 1604942 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    96.9 m at 351.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1604942 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 1604752 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    41.8 m at 44.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1604752 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 1309074 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    262.9 m at 43.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1309074 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 522267 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1339.1 m at 127.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 522267 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 522419 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1334.6 m at 217.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 522419 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 1503938 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    148.4 m at 123.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1503938 Grade official_spatial

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Point Perry
Lot on plan
not established from the cadastre
Coordinates
-26.53593, 153.09593 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
point

What this approach was read from