Public Trails Computed from official land records

Somerset · Tumbridge Gully

Tumbridge Gully from Mary Street

entry is a road 0 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class tumbridge-gully--from-mary-street

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Mary Street, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.24561, 152.42304

That is Mary Street, where the walk below begins — 2.7 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.24561, 152.42304

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 797320 nothing mapped 344.3 m 16.6° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Watercourse bed 809366 nothing mapped 25.3 m 325.0° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
3 Watercourse bed 806554 nothing mapped 25.3 m 325.0° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
4 Road reserve 807656 nothing mapped 249.6 m 316.0° NW Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 807580 nothing mapped 104.4 m 246.8° WSW Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 807276 nothing mapped 42.8 m 320.7° NW Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 806972 nothing mapped 45.4 m 13.5° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 808036 nothing mapped 19.3 m 0.7° N Official spatial — evidence class
9 Road reserve 807048 nothing mapped 60.6 m 45.8° NE Official spatial — evidence class
10 Road reserve 822286 nothing mapped 30.8 m 66.2° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
11 Road reserve 825326 nothing mapped 100.6 m 54.2° NE Official spatial — evidence class
12 Road reserve 825554 nothing mapped 282.4 m 328.2° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
13 Road reserve 825098 nothing mapped 100.6 m 54.2° NE Official spatial — evidence class
14 Road reserve 825174 nothing mapped 282.5 m 140.1° SE Official spatial — evidence class
15 Road reserve 827226 nothing mapped 107.5 m 56.3° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
16 Watercourse bed 824262 nothing mapped 550.9 m 320.7° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
17 Watercourse bed 547964 nothing mapped 351.4 m 335.2° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 2723.7 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 797320 and 806554 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 809366 and 807656 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 827226 and 547964 is 547.88 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

0 m up and 5 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 5 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 2698.7 m · height 105.0 to 110.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
0.0 m
Total descent
5.0 m
Steepest sustained
0.5% over 943.5 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
199.5 m 110.0 m
268.3 m 110.0 m
302.9 m 110.0 m
399.2 m 110.0 m
1034.9 m 110.0 m
1081.8 m 110.0 m
1188.2 m 110.0 m
2131.6 m 105.0 m
2148.5 m 105.0 m
2217.2 m 105.0 m
2512.6 m 105.0 m
2515.0 m 105.0 m
2528.8 m 105.0 m
2698.7 m 105.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 17 legs from Mary Street, 2723.7 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 5SP238512, recorded tenure "Freehold". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 797320 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    344.3 m at 16.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 797320 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 809366 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    25.3 m at 325.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 809366 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 3: 806554 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    25.3 m at 325.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 806554 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 4: 807656 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    249.6 m at 316.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 807656 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 807580 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    104.4 m at 246.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 807580 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 807276 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    42.8 m at 320.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 807276 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 806972 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    45.4 m at 13.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 806972 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 808036 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    19.3 m at 0.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 808036 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 807048 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    60.6 m at 45.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 807048 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 822286 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    30.8 m at 66.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 822286 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 11: 825326 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    100.6 m at 54.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 825326 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 12: 825554 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    282.4 m at 328.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 825554 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 13: 825098 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    100.6 m at 54.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 825098 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 14: 825174 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    282.5 m at 140.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 825174 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 15: 827226 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    107.5 m at 56.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 827226 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 16: 824262 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    550.9 m at 320.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 824262 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 17: 547964 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    351.4 m at 335.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 547964 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Tumbridge Gully
Lot on plan
5SP238512
Coordinates
-27.23111, 152.41944 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from