Public Trails Computed from official land records

Somerset Official spatial — evidence class · Somerset · QLD

Kipper Creek (East Branch)

Lawful route land the public may cross — no track, you navigate it

Gazetted name -27.28333, 152.26889 Deongwar State Forest · State Forest watercourse

Access verdict · Lawful, nothing to flag · weakest evidence in the chain: official spatial record

Public land — inside Deongwar State Forest. No published track reaches it — the lawful ground to it is a chain of parcels.

Being at this point is lawful on the records below. Getting there is a separate question, answered route by route — and each route carries its own verdict and its own caveats.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

What this place is A definition, then the record

A watercourse — the channel a creek or river runs in, named at one coordinate along a length that may run for kilometres. Whether there is water in it is not recorded, and neither is whether its bed may be walked — that is a question about the land the channel crosses, answered on this site by the tenure chain rather than by the name.

Kipper Creek (East Branch) sits on Kipper Creek (West Branch). The surveyed centreline of that watercourse runs 5.4 m from the recorded point, which is the whole evidence for saying it is this one. Official spatial — evidence class

The point falls inside Deongwar State Forest, designated State Forest. Official spatial — evidence class

The point falls outside every World Heritage property the state maps.

The rock at the surface is sedimentary and mafic volcanic rock, mapped as Pinecliff Formation (Pccp) , middle permian in age. The survey describes it as: Chert, mudstone, arenite, conglomerate, andesite, basalt Official spatial — evidence class

The register maps one ecosystem over this ground, each with the share of it the register states.

  • 100% — Simple notophyll vine forest often with abundant Archontophoenix cunninghamiana (gully vine forest) on metamorphics +/- interbedded volcanics 12.11.1 · Least concern Official spatial — evidence class

On the record — what the registers actually say Sources, licences and dataset versions

What each register holds about this place
Claim What the record says Evidence
Name "Kipper Creek (East Branch)" is a gazetted register entry. Gazetted — evidence class
Tenure Resolved to Forest estate, recorded as "State Forest". Official spatial — evidence class
Parcel 528FTY1889 Official spatial — evidence class
Council area This place sits inside Somerset, tested against the boundary that council area publishes. Official spatial — evidence class
Estate Deongwar State Forest , designated State Forest. Declared under the Forestry Act 1959; 4,740 ha as gazetted; current gazettal 26 Mar 2010; first gazetted 1 Jan 1979; no encumbrance recorded. Official spatial — evidence class
Watercourse Kipper Creek (West Branch), whose surveyed centreline runs 5.4 m away. Official spatial — evidence class
Feature Recorded as a watercourse in the source layer; no terrain rule was needed to find it. Official spatial — evidence class

Where it is

Map

Map of Kipper Creek (East Branch) and the starts of the 4 published approaches to it, over the parcels, corridors, estate and tracks around them.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

Is there a track to it No published way within range

No vetted way the managing authority publishes comes within range of this point. That is a fact about the access record, not about the ground: an unmapped pad may well exist, and this site will not invent one on the strength of that.

Approaches — one page each 4 published of 7 computed

7 ways in were computed and 4 are published here. The rest either reach the same ground from a few hundred metres away — the same drive and the same walk — or reach no lawful chain at all, which is only worth saying when nothing else does.

Kipper Creek (East Branch) from Fig Gully Firebreak

Official spatial · Lawful, nothing to flag — evidence class kipper-creek-east-branch--from-fig-gully-firebreak
Verdict
Lawful, nothing to flag
One way
597.2 m
Caveats
none

A lawful chain was established from this entry. Open the route page for the legs, the crossings and what each one rests on.

Kipper Creek (East Branch) from formed natural track off Regent Road

Official spatial · Lawful, nothing to flag — evidence class kipper-creek-east-branch--from-formed-natural-track-off-regent-road
Verdict
Lawful, nothing to flag
One way
2201.6 m
Caveats
none

A lawful chain was established from this entry. Open the route page for the legs, the crossings and what each one rests on.

Kipper Creek (East Branch) from Grapetree Road

Official spatial · Lawful, nothing to flag — evidence class kipper-creek-east-branch--from-grapetree-road
Verdict
Lawful, nothing to flag
One way
1360.6 m
Caveats
none

A lawful chain was established from this entry. Open the route page for the legs, the crossings and what each one rests on.

Kipper Creek (East Branch) from Internal Roads

Official spatial · Lawful, nothing to flag — evidence class kipper-creek-east-branch--from-internal-roads
Verdict
Lawful, nothing to flag
One way
1751.6 m
Caveats
none

A lawful chain was established from this entry. Open the route page for the legs, the crossings and what each one rests on.

Before you go Published alerts as at the snapshot date

The authority that manages this area publishes its alerts as data, and it published none for here in the snapshot this page was built from. That is not the same as "open" — a snapshot is a moment, and conditions move faster than one.

On Country

No registered cultural heritage party boundary in the published dataset covers this point. That is the state of the dataset, not a statement that no party has an interest here.

A cultural heritage party boundary and a native title claim are different legal things. This page never conflates them, and it publishes neither as a permission.

All land and waters in Queensland carry a duty of care under s.23 of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (Qld) — including here. Cultural heritage site locations are restricted by law (ss.38–46), deliberately, for site protection. This site holds party boundaries only and will never republish site locations. Check the public register and, where in doubt, seek guidance from the Aboriginal party for the area.

Searching a register does not of itself satisfy the duty of care.

Rules here — derived from tenure State Forest · statutory inference

Conduct rules follow from tenure and the legislation that governs it. Nothing specific is inferred here, which means you should read the signs, not that no rules apply.

Statutes relied on: Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Qld) and its regulations for protected estate; Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 for watercourse beds; Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (Qld) ss.23 and 38–46 for the duty of care and for why site locations are never republished here.

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Kipper Creek (East Branch), Deongwar State Forest
Lot on plan
528FTY1889
Coordinates
-27.28333, 152.26889 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this place was read from