Public Trails Computed from official land records

Scenic Rim · Cedar Creek

Cedar Creek from Chardon Break

entry is a track 70 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class cedar-creek-6743--from-chardon-break

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Chardon Break, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.81744, 153.16880

That is Chardon Break, where the walk below begins — 4.3 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.81744, 153.16880

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 5199198 Chardons Bridge Road open 377.8 m 340.1° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 1984902 Veivers Road open 334.2 m 53.3° NE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 5199236 nothing mapped 362.2 m 186.4° S Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1112419 nothing mapped 486.1 m 99.6° E Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 1112533 nothing mapped 20.1 m 99.6° E Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 1112495 nothing mapped 658.4 m 100.7° E Official spatial — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 1114813 nothing mapped 1863.6 m 203.2° SSW Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 2616504 nothing mapped 211.7 m 205.3° SSW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total 642.5 m mapped 4314.1 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1112495 and 2616504 is 1657.99 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No steps, but the record maps ground here

at least 2 hours out and back

at least 1 hour there at least 1 hour back

70 m up and 110 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 110 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

What is mapped along this chain

A managing authority has surveyed a way along 643 m of this 4314 m chain — about 15% of it. That is a statement about what is on the ground, not about your right to be there, which the parcels above already settled, and not a direction: no step below is measured along any of these ways.

  • Leg 1 Chardons Bridge Road Official spatial — evidence class

    318 m along it · the managing authority publishes it as open to the public (Local Government Authority).

  • Leg 2 Veivers Road Official spatial — evidence class

    324 m along it · the managing authority publishes it as open to the public (Local Government Authority).

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 4312.1 m · height 10.0 to 70.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
70.0 m
Total descent
110.0 m
Steepest sustained
16.6% over 60.3 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
34.1 m 55.0 m
65.2 m 55.0 m
101.9 m 50.0 m
132.0 m 45.0 m
182.2 m 40.0 m
239.6 m 35.0 m
286.1 m 30.0 m
335.8 m 25.0 m
439.4 m 20.0 m
553.4 m 20.0 m
609.5 m 25.0 m
746.3 m 30.0 m
803.8 m 35.0 m
855.0 m 40.0 m
921.4 m 45.0 m
961.6 m 50.0 m
994.8 m 55.0 m
1021.9 m 60.0 m
1058.2 m 65.0 m
1113.7 m 70.0 m
1119.9 m 70.0 m
1121.6 m 70.0 m
1143.3 m 70.0 m
1210.0 m 65.0 m
1260.2 m 60.0 m
1475.8 m 55.0 m
1525.9 m 50.0 m
1570.7 m 45.0 m
1620.4 m 40.0 m
1670.1 m 35.0 m
1722.8 m 30.0 m
1789.4 m 25.0 m
1893.2 m 20.0 m
1964.1 m 15.0 m
1981.5 m 15.0 m
2219.2 m 15.0 m
2224.6 m 10.0 m
2248.0 m 10.0 m
2277.0 m 15.0 m
2465.6 m 20.0 m
2696.7 m 20.0 m
2850.1 m 15.0 m
2883.3 m 15.0 m
3342.6 m 20.0 m
3352.6 m 20.0 m
3359.2 m 20.0 m
3361.0 m 20.0 m
3364.5 m 20.0 m
3368.9 m 20.0 m
3371.6 m 20.0 m
3372.6 m 20.0 m
3542.2 m 15.0 m
3583.2 m 10.0 m
3878.6 m 10.0 m
3968.3 m 15.0 m
4012.2 m 15.0 m
4194.5 m 15.0 m
4281.3 m 15.0 m
4312.1 m 15.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 8 legs from Chardon Break, 4314.1 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 1270309, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 5199198 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    377.8 m at 340.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 5199198 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 1984902 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    334.2 m at 53.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1984902 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 5199236 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    362.2 m at 186.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 5199236 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1112419 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    486.1 m at 99.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1112419 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 1112533 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.1 m at 99.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1112533 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 1112495 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    658.4 m at 100.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1112495 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 1114813 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1863.6 m at 203.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1114813 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 2616504 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    211.7 m at 205.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2616504 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Cedar Creek
Lot on plan
1270309
Coordinates
-27.83472, 153.17306 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse