Public Trails Computed from official land records

Redland · Eprapah Creek

Eprapah Creek from Pateman Parade

entry is a road 0 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class eprapah-creek--from-pateman-parade

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Pateman Parade, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.57627, 153.27904

That is Pateman Parade, where the walk below begins — 3.6 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.57627, 153.27904

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 1874288 nothing mapped 53.3 m 93.3° E Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 4117831 nothing mapped 37.2 m 140.4° SE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 1870754 nothing mapped 375.7 m 185.2° S Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1870070 nothing mapped 66.4 m 225.8° SW Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 1890514 nothing mapped 77.0 m 129.8° SE Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 5976564 nothing mapped 143.0 m 116.1° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 1837846 nothing mapped 19.9 m 238.3° WSW Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 5995146 nothing mapped 1.2 m 156.4° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 1963056 nothing mapped 578.7 m 74.0° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 1837580 nothing mapped 372.7 m 76.5° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Road reserve 1836364 nothing mapped 187.3 m 27.7° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
12 Road reserve 1836250 nothing mapped 233.2 m 40.0° NE Official spatial — evidence class
13 Watercourse bed 1836402 nothing mapped 429.0 m 343.4° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
14 Watercourse bed 2097120 nothing mapped 881.0 m 348.7° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
15 Watercourse bed 528005 nothing mapped 106.4 m 87.6° E Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 3562.0 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 5976564 and 5995146 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1837846 and 1963056 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 5995146 and 1837580 is 505.85 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1963056 and 1836364 is 18.87 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1836250 and 2097120 is 297.76 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1836402 and 527701 is 881.03 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2097120 and 2097082 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 527701 and 528005 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1½ hours out and back

at least three quarters of an hour there at least three quarters of an hour back

0 m up and 10 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 10 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 3484.8 m · height 0.0 to 10.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
0.0 m
Total descent
10.0 m
Steepest sustained
5.7% over 87.9 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
89.0 m 10.0 m
491.3 m 10.0 m
604.0 m 10.0 m
649.0 m 5.0 m
691.9 m 5.0 m
716.3 m 5.0 m
1475.5 m 0.0 m
1488.9 m 0.0 m
1566.9 m 0.0 m
1574.4 m 0.0 m
1688.5 m 0.0 m
1734.3 m 0.0 m
2084.6 m 0.0 m
2150.8 m 0.0 m
2327.0 m 0.0 m
2375.1 m 0.0 m
2543.0 m 0.0 m
2592.3 m 0.0 m
3103.3 m 0.0 m
3178.9 m 0.0 m
3484.8 m 0.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 15 legs from Pateman Parade, 3562.0 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 528005, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 1874288 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    53.3 m at 93.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1874288 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 4117831 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    37.2 m at 140.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 4117831 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 1870754 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    375.7 m at 185.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1870754 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1870070 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    66.4 m at 225.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1870070 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 1890514 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    77.0 m at 129.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1890514 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 5976564 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    143.0 m at 116.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 5976564 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 1837846 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    19.9 m at 238.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1837846 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 5995146 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1.2 m at 156.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 5995146 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 1963056 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    578.7 m at 74.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1963056 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 1837580 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    372.7 m at 76.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1837580 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 1836364 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    187.3 m at 27.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1836364 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 12: 1836250 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    233.2 m at 40.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1836250 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 13: 1836402 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    429.0 m at 343.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1836402 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 14: 2097120 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    881.0 m at 348.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2097120 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 15: 528005 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    106.4 m at 87.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 528005 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Eprapah Creek
Lot on plan
528005
Coordinates
-27.56459, 153.29051 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from