Public Trails Computed from official land records

Redland · Empire Point

Empire Point from Tarvin Close

entry is a road 10 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class empire-point--from-tarvin-close

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Tarvin Close, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.50189, 153.24919

That is Tarvin Close, where the walk below begins — 3.5 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.50189, 153.24919

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 673788 nothing mapped 24.5 m 61.7° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 673750 nothing mapped 84.2 m 351.2° N Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 673712 nothing mapped 282.6 m 299.5° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 673636 nothing mapped 27.9 m 325.8° NW Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 672648 nothing mapped 68.2 m 333.9° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 1473118 nothing mapped 32.9 m 9.6° N Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 1471636 nothing mapped 103.8 m 9.6° N Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 1473080 nothing mapped 20.1 m 9.5° N Official spatial — evidence class
9 Road reserve 1472434 nothing mapped 192.5 m 15.6° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
10 Road reserve 1473004 nothing mapped 83.5 m 97.4° E Official spatial — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 1472092 nothing mapped 656.4 m 26.4° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
12 Watercourse bed 530133 nothing mapped 444.0 m 125.6° SE Statutory inference — evidence class
13 Watercourse bed 529905 nothing mapped 512.7 m 100.7° E Statutory inference — evidence class
14 Watercourse bed 529677 nothing mapped 890.7 m 159.5° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
15 Watercourse bed 529715 nothing mapped 34.0 m 182.0° S Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 3458.0 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1473004 and 530133 is 422.27 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1472092 and 529943 is 354.69 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 530133 and 529981 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 529943 and 529905 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 529981 and 529677 is 512.68 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 529905 and 529715 is 728.28 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1½ hours out and back

at least three quarters of an hour there at least three quarters of an hour back

10 m up and 15 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 15 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 2976.6 m · height 0.0 to 10.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
10.0 m
Total descent
15.0 m
Steepest sustained
9.7% over 51.6 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
14.9 m 5.0 m
134.7 m 5.0 m
157.4 m 5.0 m
158.0 m 5.0 m
158.0 m 5.0 m
1675.3 m 0.0 m
1686.9 m 0.0 m
1998.0 m 0.0 m
2114.0 m 0.0 m
2554.6 m 5.0 m
2593.9 m 10.0 m
2606.2 m 10.0 m
2655.5 m 5.0 m
2801.8 m 0.0 m
2972.9 m 0.0 m
2974.9 m 0.0 m
2976.6 m 0.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 15 legs from Tarvin Close, 3458.0 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 529715, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 673788 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    24.5 m at 61.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 673788 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 673750 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    84.2 m at 351.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 673750 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 673712 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    282.6 m at 299.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 673712 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 673636 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    27.9 m at 325.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 673636 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 672648 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    68.2 m at 333.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 672648 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 1473118 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    32.9 m at 9.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1473118 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 1471636 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    103.8 m at 9.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1471636 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 1473080 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.1 m at 9.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1473080 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 1472434 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    192.5 m at 15.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1472434 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 1473004 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    83.5 m at 97.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1473004 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 11: 1472092 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    656.4 m at 26.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1472092 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 12: 530133 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    444.0 m at 125.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 530133 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 13: 529905 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    512.7 m at 100.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 529905 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 14: 529677 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    890.7 m at 159.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 529677 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 15: 529715 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    34.0 m at 182.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 529715 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Empire Point
Lot on plan
529715
Coordinates
-27.50177, 153.26280 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
point

What this approach was read from