Public Trails Computed from official land records

Noosa · Weyba Creek

Weyba Creek from formed sealed track off Weyba Road

entry is a track 0 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class weyba-creek--from-formed-sealed-track-off-weyba-road

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from formed sealed track off Weyba Road, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -26.40442, 153.07749

That is formed sealed track off Weyba Road, where the walk below begins — 1.3 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-26.40442, 153.07749

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 961947 Footpaths unassessed 47.4 m 77.5° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Protected estate 167CP849516 nothing mapped 423.9 m 359.4° N Official spatial — evidence class
3 Watercourse bed 1243261 nothing mapped 67.4 m 33.4° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
4 Watercourse bed 1182461 nothing mapped 158.0 m 330.2° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
5 Watercourse bed 1182423 nothing mapped 78.8 m 57.9° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
6 Watercourse bed 1180181 nothing mapped 484.3 m 33.2° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
Total 38.0 m mapped 1259.8 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 167CP849516 and 1182461 is 57.40 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1243261 and 1182423 is 50.66 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1182461 and 1180181 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No steps, but the record maps ground here

at least half an hour out and back

at least a quarter of an hour there at least a quarter of an hour back

0 m up and 0 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 0 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

What is mapped along this chain

A managing authority has surveyed a way along 38 m of this 1260 m chain — about 3% of it. That is a statement about what is on the ground, not about your right to be there, which the parcels above already settled, and not a direction: no step below is measured along any of these ways.

  • Leg 1 Footpaths Official spatial — evidence class

    38 m along it · the authority maps it but publishes no assessment of it (Local Government Authority).

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 1218.2 m · height 0.0 to 0.0 m Read off an unstated interval along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
0.0 m
Total descent
0.0 m
Steepest sustained
0.0% over 74.2 m
Contour interval
not stated by the layer
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
325.6 m 0.0 m
346.5 m 0.0 m
465.0 m 0.0 m
594.4 m 0.0 m
668.6 m 0.0 m
925.4 m 0.0 m
1218.2 m 0.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of an unstated interval cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 6 legs from formed sealed track off Weyba Road, 1259.8 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 1180181, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 961947 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    47.4 m at 77.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 961947 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 167CP849516 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    423.9 m at 359.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 167CP849516 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 1243261 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    67.4 m at 33.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1243261 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 4: 1182461 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    158.0 m at 330.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1182461 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 5: 1182423 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    78.8 m at 57.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1182423 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 6: 1180181 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    484.3 m at 33.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1180181 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Weyba Creek
Lot on plan
1180181
Coordinates
-26.39472, 153.08083 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from