Public Trails Computed from official land records

Noosa · Falls Creek

Falls Creek from Ann Street

entry is a road 0 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class falls-creek--from-ann-street

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Ann Street, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -26.33620, 152.83102

That is Ann Street, where the walk below begins — 3.9 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-26.33620, 152.83102

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 1682962 nothing mapped 20.3 m 106.9° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 1682886 nothing mapped 81.4 m 106.9° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 1683684 nothing mapped 20.3 m 106.9° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1683646 nothing mapped 183.1 m 106.9° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 1685128 nothing mapped 171.8 m 188.6° S Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 1685166 nothing mapped 53.1 m 233.6° SW Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 1683608 nothing mapped 324.3 m 68.3° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 1683570 nothing mapped 46.0 m 97.9° E Official spatial — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 1823030 nothing mapped 532.3 m 159.6° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 1823068 nothing mapped 964.7 m 264.1° W Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 1689802 nothing mapped 1034.5 m 336.0° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
12 Road reserve 1689688 nothing mapped 7.8 m 344.6° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
13 Watercourse bed 1873874 nothing mapped 405.7 m 335.0° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
14 Watercourse bed 1873836 nothing mapped 23.4 m 312.2° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 3868.7 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1683570 and 1823068 is 523.53 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1823030 and 1689802 is 910.98 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1823068 and 1689688 is 990.14 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1689688 and 1873836 is 395.99 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1½ hours out and back

at least three quarters of an hour there at least three quarters of an hour back

0 m up and 25 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 25 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 3825.3 m · height 70.0 to 95.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
0.0 m
Total descent
25.0 m
Steepest sustained
7.3% over 68.9 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
18.3 m 95.0 m
91.1 m 95.0 m
92.1 m 95.0 m
95.5 m 95.0 m
164.5 m 90.0 m
272.0 m 90.0 m
394.8 m 90.0 m
517.2 m 85.0 m
542.0 m 85.0 m
732.1 m 85.0 m
894.6 m 80.0 m
963.7 m 75.0 m
978.4 m 75.0 m
1025.0 m 75.0 m
1035.8 m 75.0 m
1245.3 m 75.0 m
1265.1 m 75.0 m
1307.4 m 75.0 m
1321.9 m 75.0 m
1404.8 m 75.0 m
1426.1 m 75.0 m
1443.4 m 75.0 m
1469.2 m 75.0 m
1588.9 m 75.0 m
1857.6 m 75.0 m
1979.1 m 75.0 m
2043.5 m 75.0 m
2190.8 m 75.0 m
2194.6 m 75.0 m
2198.5 m 75.0 m
2200.8 m 75.0 m
2208.5 m 75.0 m
2208.9 m 75.0 m
2209.2 m 75.0 m
2209.6 m 75.0 m
2210.8 m 75.0 m
2211.4 m 75.0 m
2275.0 m 75.0 m
2706.9 m 70.0 m
2725.9 m 70.0 m
2759.0 m 70.0 m
2774.1 m 70.0 m
2860.2 m 70.0 m
2882.6 m 70.0 m
3067.7 m 70.0 m
3079.8 m 70.0 m
3173.1 m 70.0 m
3194.5 m 70.0 m
3337.2 m 70.0 m
3348.9 m 70.0 m
3372.4 m 70.0 m
3414.0 m 70.0 m
3825.3 m 70.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 14 legs from Ann Street, 3868.7 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 1873836, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 1682962 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.3 m at 106.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1682962 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 1682886 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    81.4 m at 106.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1682886 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 1683684 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.3 m at 106.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1683684 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1683646 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    183.1 m at 106.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1683646 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 1685128 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    171.8 m at 188.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1685128 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 1685166 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    53.1 m at 233.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1685166 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 1683608 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    324.3 m at 68.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1683608 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 1683570 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    46.0 m at 97.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1683570 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 1823030 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    532.3 m at 159.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1823030 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 1823068 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    964.7 m at 264.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1823068 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 1689802 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1034.5 m at 336.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1689802 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 12: 1689688 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    7.8 m at 344.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1689688 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 13: 1873874 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    405.7 m at 335.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1873874 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 14: 1873836 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    23.4 m at 312.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1873836 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Falls Creek
Lot on plan
1873836
Coordinates
-26.33114, 152.82284 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from