Public Trails Computed from official land records

Noosa · Duns Beach

Duns Beach from Louis Bazzo Drive

entry is a road 5 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class duns-beach--from-louis-bazzo-drive

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Louis Bazzo Drive, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -26.29173, 152.98211

That is Louis Bazzo Drive, where the walk below begins — 7.7 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-26.29173, 152.98211

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 961116 nothing mapped 478.8 m 221.8° SW Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 961078 nothing mapped 761.5 m 229.7° SW Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 957392 nothing mapped 20.7 m 226.0° SW Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 957202 nothing mapped 536.6 m 229.5° SW Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 957354 nothing mapped 170.2 m 198.3° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 958038 nothing mapped 558.2 m 294.4° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 935770 nothing mapped 951.8 m 207.6° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
8 Protected estate 2AP23640 nothing mapped 501.0 m 120.4° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
9 Road reserve 934136 Louis Bazzo Drive open 72.3 m 82.3° E Official spatial — evidence class
10 Road reserve 934098 Louis Bazzo Drive open 33.3 m 91.1° E Official spatial — evidence class
11 Protected estate 5AP23653 nothing mapped 574.3 m 66.4° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
12 Road reserve 933870 McKinnon Drive open 92.2 m 137.1° SE Official spatial — evidence class
13 Road reserve 960850 nothing mapped 138.4 m 87.0° E Official spatial — evidence class
14 Protected estate 1MCH843845 nothing mapped 574.1 m 89.4° E Official spatial — evidence class
15 Watercourse bed 960964 nothing mapped 800.6 m 70.5° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
16 Watercourse bed 968640 nothing mapped 1462.9 m 8.2° N Statutory inference — evidence class
Total 189.5 m mapped 7726.9 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1MCH843845 and 968640 is 559.38 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No steps, but the record maps ground here

at least 3 hours out and back

at least 1½ hours there at least 1½ hours back

5 m up and 5 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 5 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

What is mapped along this chain

A managing authority has surveyed a way along 190 m of this 7727 m chain — about 2% of it. That is a statement about what is on the ground, not about your right to be there, which the parcels above already settled, and not a direction: no step below is measured along any of these ways.

  • Legs 9–10 Louis Bazzo Drive Official spatial — evidence class

    97 m along it · the managing authority publishes it as open to the public (Local Government Authority).

  • Leg 12 McKinnon Drive Official spatial — evidence class

    92 m along it · the managing authority publishes it as open to the public (Local Government Authority).

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 4247.4 m · height 5.0 to 10.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
5.0 m
Total descent
5.0 m
Steepest sustained
1.3% over 387.3 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
873.9 m 5.0 m
919.9 m 5.0 m
1219.0 m 5.0 m
1225.0 m 5.0 m
1242.9 m 5.0 m
3131.6 m 10.0 m
3291.6 m 10.0 m
3428.7 m 10.0 m
3494.8 m 10.0 m
3825.7 m 10.0 m
3832.7 m 10.0 m
4220.0 m 5.0 m
4223.6 m 5.0 m
4230.0 m 5.0 m
4247.3 m 5.0 m
4247.4 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 16 legs from Louis Bazzo Drive, 7726.9 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 968640, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 961116 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    478.8 m at 221.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 961116 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 961078 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    761.5 m at 229.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 961078 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 957392 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.7 m at 226.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 957392 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 957202 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    536.6 m at 229.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 957202 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 957354 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    170.2 m at 198.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 957354 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 958038 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    558.2 m at 294.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 958038 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 935770 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    951.8 m at 207.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 935770 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 2AP23640 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    501.0 m at 120.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2AP23640 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 934136 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    72.3 m at 82.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 934136 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 934098 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    33.3 m at 91.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 934098 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 11: 5AP23653 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    574.3 m at 66.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 5AP23653 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 12: 933870 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    92.2 m at 137.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 933870 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 13: 960850 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    138.4 m at 87.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 960850 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 14: 1MCH843845 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    574.1 m at 89.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1MCH843845 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 15: 960964 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    800.6 m at 70.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 960964 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 16: 968640 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1462.9 m at 8.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 968640 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Duns Beach
Lot on plan
968640
Coordinates
-26.29480, 152.98690 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
beach

What this approach was read from