Public Trails Computed from official land records

Moreton Bay · Wywurri Creek

Wywurri Creek from Walters Crescent

entry is a road 5 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class wywurri-creek--from-walters-crescent

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Walters Crescent, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.23751, 153.03451

That is Walters Crescent, where the walk below begins — 2.8 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.23751, 153.03451

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 4284803 nothing mapped 69.9 m 197.9° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 4269641 nothing mapped 110.1 m 298.1° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve MSP279076 nothing mapped 40.5 m 282.1° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 4268197 nothing mapped 550.5 m 29.7° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 523391 nothing mapped 167.1 m 303.8° NW Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 508533 nothing mapped 128.5 m 29.7° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 512865 nothing mapped 102.2 m 113.5° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 517881 nothing mapped 77.3 m 87.6° E Official spatial — evidence class
9 Road reserve 520541 nothing mapped 34.8 m 62.1° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
10 Road reserve 514575 nothing mapped 23.5 m 123.0° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
11 Road reserve 523277 nothing mapped 549.5 m 47.8° NE Official spatial — evidence class
12 Road reserve 523353 nothing mapped 185.1 m 48.7° NE Official spatial — evidence class
13 Road reserve 2841267 nothing mapped 291.4 m 52.3° NE Official spatial — evidence class
14 Watercourse bed 2841533 nothing mapped 13.6 m 91.3° E Statutory inference — evidence class
15 Watercourse bed 295963 nothing mapped 11.5 m 103.4° ESE Statutory inference — evidence class
16 Road reserve 292695 nothing mapped 266.2 m 165.2° SSE Official spatial — evidence class
17 Watercourse bed 379107 nothing mapped 160.0 m 102.5° ESE Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 2781.7 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2841267 and 295963 is 11.40 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2841533 and 292695 is 7.87 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

5 m up and 10 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 10 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 1918.2 m · height 5.0 to 15.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
5.0 m
Total descent
10.0 m
Steepest sustained
9.0% over 55.3 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
116.3 m 10.0 m
136.8 m 15.0 m
171.6 m 15.0 m
314.5 m 10.0 m
528.4 m 5.0 m
1016.2 m 5.0 m
1057.0 m 5.0 m
1271.0 m 5.0 m
1302.3 m 5.0 m
1561.3 m 5.0 m
1918.2 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 17 legs from Walters Crescent, 2781.7 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 3045244, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 4284803 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    69.9 m at 197.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 4284803 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 4269641 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    110.1 m at 298.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 4269641 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: MSP279076 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    40.5 m at 282.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference MSP279076 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 4268197 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    550.5 m at 29.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 4268197 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 523391 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    167.1 m at 303.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 523391 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 508533 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    128.5 m at 29.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 508533 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 512865 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    102.2 m at 113.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 512865 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 517881 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    77.3 m at 87.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 517881 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 520541 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    34.8 m at 62.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 520541 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 514575 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    23.5 m at 123.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 514575 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 11: 523277 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    549.5 m at 47.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 523277 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 12: 523353 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    185.1 m at 48.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 523353 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 13: 2841267 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    291.4 m at 52.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2841267 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 14: 2841533 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    13.6 m at 91.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2841533 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 15: 295963 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    11.5 m at 103.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 295963 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 16: 292695 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    266.2 m at 165.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 292695 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 17: 379107 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    160.0 m at 102.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 379107 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Wywurri Creek
Lot on plan
3045244
Coordinates
-27.22833, 153.04750 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from