Public Trails Computed from official land records

Moreton Bay · Eatons Crossing

Eatons Crossing from Lawson Road

entry is a road 115 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class eatons-crossing--from-lawson-road

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Lawson Road, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.34330, 152.89155

That is Lawson Road, where the walk below begins — 3.7 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.34330, 152.89155

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 3912558 nothing mapped 245.4 m 341.2° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 3912596 nothing mapped 25.8 m 338.2° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 3912482 nothing mapped 599.3 m 316.8° NW Official spatial — evidence class
4 Watercourse bed 3912710 nothing mapped 473.4 m 86.6° E Statutory inference — evidence class
5 Watercourse bed 262255 nothing mapped 180.4 m 86.0° E Statutory inference — evidence class
6 Watercourse bed 86505 nothing mapped 188.9 m 79.5° E Statutory inference — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 86543 nothing mapped 679.1 m 95.9° E Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 8596 nothing mapped 1133.9 m 125.6° SE Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Road reserve 92889 nothing mapped 30.8 m 202.9° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 269247 nothing mapped 20.7 m 183.2° S Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 269285 nothing mapped 12.3 m 164.9° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
12 Watercourse bed 268715 nothing mapped 148.2 m 172.0° S Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 3738.2 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 3912482 and 262255 is 136.65 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 3912710 and 86505 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 262255 and 86543 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 86505 and 8596 is 668.97 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 86543 and 92889 is 1043.75 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 92889 and 269285 is 4.09 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 269247 and 268715 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 2 hours out and back

at least 1 hour there at least 1 hour back

115 m up and 180 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 180 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 3711.9 m · height 25.0 to 90.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
115.0 m
Total descent
180.0 m
Steepest sustained
37.4% over 66.9 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
21.1 m 90.0 m
80.2 m 85.0 m
155.5 m 80.0 m
259.7 m 80.0 m
268.7 m 80.0 m
302.2 m 75.0 m
319.8 m 70.0 m
340.3 m 65.0 m
371.0 m 60.0 m
433.4 m 55.0 m
461.1 m 50.0 m
479.3 m 45.0 m
504.9 m 45.0 m
560.2 m 50.0 m
599.3 m 55.0 m
619.2 m 60.0 m
647.3 m 65.0 m
690.9 m 70.0 m
699.1 m 70.0 m
721.8 m 65.0 m
731.4 m 60.0 m
747.2 m 55.0 m
773.9 m 50.0 m
802.9 m 45.0 m
804.7 m 45.0 m
836.3 m 45.0 m
882.7 m 45.0 m
896.4 m 45.0 m
902.0 m 45.0 m
929.1 m 50.0 m
961.9 m 50.0 m
1018.5 m 45.0 m
1099.2 m 45.0 m
1293.5 m 45.0 m
1321.2 m 40.0 m
1323.3 m 40.0 m
1328.5 m 40.0 m
1723.8 m 40.0 m
1758.0 m 45.0 m
1779.5 m 45.0 m
1863.7 m 40.0 m
1897.1 m 40.0 m
1904.0 m 45.0 m
1909.0 m 50.0 m
1916.6 m 55.0 m
1928.4 m 60.0 m
1981.6 m 60.0 m
2001.4 m 55.0 m
2016.6 m 50.0 m
2031.4 m 45.0 m
2039.3 m 40.0 m
2048.5 m 35.0 m
2057.3 m 35.0 m
2101.9 m 40.0 m
2164.3 m 45.0 m
2195.3 m 50.0 m
2250.3 m 50.0 m
2298.9 m 45.0 m
2325.1 m 40.0 m
2390.9 m 35.0 m
2443.4 m 35.0 m
2462.8 m 40.0 m
2490.4 m 40.0 m
2661.0 m 35.0 m
2722.5 m 35.0 m
2754.0 m 40.0 m
2765.4 m 45.0 m
2790.0 m 50.0 m
2824.6 m 50.0 m
2871.4 m 45.0 m
2903.3 m 40.0 m
2940.5 m 35.0 m
2988.9 m 35.0 m
2994.1 m 35.0 m
3073.7 m 35.0 m
3088.1 m 40.0 m
3139.1 m 40.0 m
3271.3 m 35.0 m
3287.1 m 30.0 m
3307.1 m 30.0 m
3311.9 m 35.0 m
3316.9 m 40.0 m
3324.7 m 45.0 m
3336.1 m 50.0 m
3396.8 m 50.0 m
3414.0 m 45.0 m
3442.1 m 40.0 m
3491.7 m 35.0 m
3521.8 m 30.0 m
3682.0 m 25.0 m
3697.5 m 25.0 m
3699.4 m 25.0 m
3704.1 m 25.0 m
3707.9 m 25.0 m
3711.9 m 25.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 12 legs from Lawson Road, 3738.2 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 268829, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 3912558 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    245.4 m at 341.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 3912558 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 3912596 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    25.8 m at 338.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 3912596 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 3912482 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    599.3 m at 316.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 3912482 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 3912710 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    473.4 m at 86.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 3912710 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 5: 262255 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    180.4 m at 86.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 262255 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 6: 86505 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    188.9 m at 79.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 86505 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 7: 86543 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    679.1 m at 95.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 86543 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 8596 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1133.9 m at 125.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 8596 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 92889 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    30.8 m at 202.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 92889 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 269247 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    20.7 m at 183.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 269247 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 269285 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    12.3 m at 164.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 269285 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 12: 268715 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    148.2 m at 172.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 268715 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Eatons Crossing
Lot on plan
268829
Coordinates
-27.34483, 152.91123 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
ford

What this approach was read from