Public Trails Computed from official land records

Logan · Dairy Creek

Dairy Creek from Castile Crescent

entry is a road 15 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class dairy-creek--from-castile-crescent

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Castile Crescent, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.70139, 153.15896

That is Castile Crescent, where the walk below begins — 3.6 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.70139, 153.15896

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 2818555 nothing mapped 141.5 m 326.4° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 2826383 nothing mapped 325.1 m 334.1° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 2818783 nothing mapped 146.1 m 324.6° NW Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 2827751 nothing mapped 25.1 m 316.2° NW Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 2757527 nothing mapped 50.6 m 309.6° NW Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 2753271 nothing mapped 94.8 m 349.3° N Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 2757223 nothing mapped 95.4 m 279.5° W Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 2757299 nothing mapped 41.5 m 281.8° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
9 Road reserve 2757185 nothing mapped 97.9 m 283.1° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
10 Road reserve 2753309 nothing mapped 302.0 m 278.9° W Official spatial — evidence class
11 Road reserve 2756653 nothing mapped 81.9 m 279.7° W Official spatial — evidence class
12 Road reserve 2757033 nothing mapped 192.2 m 279.1° W Official spatial — evidence class
13 Road reserve 2753841 nothing mapped 149.3 m 253.2° WSW Official spatial — evidence class
14 Road reserve 2753765 nothing mapped 120.1 m 151.0° SSE Official spatial — evidence class
15 Road reserve 2754145 nothing mapped 203.3 m 222.2° SW Official spatial — evidence class
16 Road reserve 2754031 nothing mapped 236.7 m 144.5° SE Official spatial — evidence class
17 Road reserve 2757869 nothing mapped 114.3 m 220.8° SW Official spatial — evidence class
18 Watercourse bed 2757603 nothing mapped 256.3 m 157.1° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
19 Watercourse bed 498190 nothing mapped 884.2 m 220.4° SW Statutory inference — evidence class
20 Watercourse bed 2878291 nothing mapped 76.2 m 292.5° WNW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 3634.5 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2757869 and 498190 is 240.49 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2757603 and 2878291 is 766.51 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1½ hours out and back

at least three quarters of an hour there at least three quarters of an hour back

15 m up and 45 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 45 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 3493.2 m · height 5.0 to 35.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
15.0 m
Total descent
45.0 m
Steepest sustained
17.0% over 58.9 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
75.0 m 35.0 m
279.4 m 35.0 m
393.4 m 30.0 m
695.9 m 25.0 m
697.4 m 25.0 m
713.0 m 25.0 m
727.3 m 20.0 m
771.9 m 15.0 m
775.3 m 15.0 m
807.3 m 15.0 m
1547.6 m 10.0 m
1548.3 m 10.0 m
1552.3 m 10.0 m
1642.0 m 5.0 m
1755.1 m 5.0 m
1877.4 m 10.0 m
2040.1 m 15.0 m
2059.4 m 15.0 m
2393.6 m 10.0 m
2411.2 m 5.0 m
2751.2 m 5.0 m
2867.3 m 10.0 m
3295.2 m 10.0 m
3371.2 m 10.0 m
3447.4 m 10.0 m
3493.2 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 20 legs from Castile Crescent, 3634.5 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 2878291, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 2818555 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    141.5 m at 326.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2818555 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 2826383 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    325.1 m at 334.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2826383 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 2818783 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    146.1 m at 324.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2818783 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 2827751 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    25.1 m at 316.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2827751 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 2757527 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    50.6 m at 309.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2757527 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 2753271 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    94.8 m at 349.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2753271 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 2757223 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    95.4 m at 279.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2757223 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 2757299 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    41.5 m at 281.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2757299 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 2757185 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    97.9 m at 283.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2757185 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 2753309 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    302.0 m at 278.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2753309 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 11: 2756653 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    81.9 m at 279.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2756653 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 12: 2757033 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    192.2 m at 279.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2757033 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 13: 2753841 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    149.3 m at 253.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2753841 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 14: 2753765 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    120.1 m at 151.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2753765 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 15: 2754145 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    203.3 m at 222.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2754145 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 16: 2754031 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    236.7 m at 144.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2754031 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 17: 2757869 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    114.3 m at 220.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2757869 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 18: 2757603 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    256.3 m at 157.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2757603 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 19: 498190 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    884.2 m at 220.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 498190 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 20: 2878291 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    76.2 m at 292.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2878291 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Dairy Creek
Lot on plan
2878291
Coordinates
-27.70724, 153.13990 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from