Lockyer Valley Official spatial — evidence class · Lockyer Valley · QLD

Red Gap

Lawful route land the public may cross — no track, you navigate it

Gazetted name -27.76251, 152.39981 pass

Access verdict · Lawful, nothing to flag · weakest evidence in the chain: official spatial record

Public land. No published track reaches it — the lawful ground to it is a chain of parcels.

Being at this point is lawful on the records below. Getting there is a separate question, answered route by route — and each route carries its own verdict and its own caveats.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

What this place is A definition, then the record

A pass — a low point in a ridge or range, and usually the reason a way goes where it does. The register names the gap rather than the way through it, so a pass being named here says nothing about whether anything crosses it now.

No watercourse the register names runs within range of Red Gap. The layer maps far more creeks than it has ever named, so that is a gap in the record rather than dry ground.

The point falls outside every protected-area estate in the snapshot.

The point falls outside every World Heritage property the state maps.

The rock at the surface is basalt, mapped as Main Range Volcanics (Tm) , eocene - miocene in age. The survey describes it as: Olivine basalt Official spatial — evidence class

The register maps 2 ecosystems over this ground, each with the share of it the register states.

60% — Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata +/- Eucalyptus crebra open forest on sedimentary rocks 12.9-10.2 · Least concern Official spatial — evidence class
40% — Eucalyptus crebra +/- E. tereticornis, Corymbia tessellaris, Angophora spp. and E. melanophloia woodland on sedimentary rocks 12.9-10.7 · Of concern Official spatial — evidence class

On the record — what the registers actually say Sources, licences and dataset versions

What each register holds about this place
Claim	What the record says	Evidence
Name	"Red Gap" is a gazetted register entry.	Gazetted — evidence class
Tenure	No tenure record covers this point in the snapshot. Unresolved is published as unresolved.	—
Parcel	No cadastral parcel was resolved at this point.	—
Council area	This place sits inside Lockyer Valley, tested against the boundary that council area publishes.	Official spatial — evidence class
Estate	This point falls outside every protected-area estate polygon in the snapshot.	—
Watercourse	No named watercourse in the snapshot runs within range of this point. The layer maps many creeks it has never named.	—
Feature	Recorded as a pass in the source layer; no terrain rule was needed to find it.	Official spatial — evidence class

Where it is

Map

Map of Red Gap and the starts of the 6 published approaches to it, over the parcels, corridors, estate and tracks around them.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

Is there a track to it No published way within range

No vetted way the managing authority publishes comes within range of this point. That is a fact about the access record, not about the ground: an unmapped pad may well exist, and this site will not invent one on the strength of that.