Public Trails Computed from official land records

Ipswich · Western Creek

Western Creek from Mount Forbes Road

entry is a road 25 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class western-creek--from-mount-forbes-road

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Mount Forbes Road, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.67190, 152.60805

That is Mount Forbes Road, where the walk below begins — 5.9 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.67190, 152.60805

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 1803297 nothing mapped 514.4 m 190.1° S Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 1803145 nothing mapped 171.2 m 236.7° WSW Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 1801853 nothing mapped 1911.7 m 279.2° W Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1803791 nothing mapped 49.9 m 29.9° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 1799763 nothing mapped 39.0 m 27.0° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 1798927 nothing mapped 525.3 m 267.0° W Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 1798813 nothing mapped 336.4 m 316.9° NW Official spatial — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 1799991 nothing mapped 1430.2 m 48.8° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Road reserve 1779737 nothing mapped 53.9 m 37.7° NE Official spatial — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 1800219 nothing mapped 59.0 m 42.2° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 1801321 nothing mapped 761.4 m 52.3° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 5852.4 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1798813 and 1779737 is 1358.89 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1779737 and 1801321 is 6.78 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 2½ hours out and back

at least 1¼ hours there at least 1¼ hours back

25 m up and 40 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 40 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 5843.8 m · height 35.0 to 70.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
25.0 m
Total descent
40.0 m
Steepest sustained
7.8% over 64.4 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
52.0 m 50.0 m
282.6 m 50.0 m
492.2 m 55.0 m
601.8 m 60.0 m
667.3 m 65.0 m
972.9 m 65.0 m
1093.7 m 65.0 m
1180.7 m 70.0 m
1255.9 m 70.0 m
1420.5 m 65.0 m
1436.4 m 65.0 m
1859.7 m 65.0 m
1933.3 m 60.0 m
2044.4 m 60.0 m
2115.7 m 65.0 m
2257.9 m 65.0 m
2325.0 m 60.0 m
2399.4 m 55.0 m
2490.7 m 50.0 m
2555.1 m 45.0 m
2780.0 m 40.0 m
2815.9 m 40.0 m
3536.4 m 40.0 m
3627.1 m 40.0 m
4664.4 m 40.0 m
4907.3 m 35.0 m
4910.5 m 35.0 m
5076.1 m 35.0 m
5092.8 m 35.0 m
5843.8 m 35.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 11 legs from Mount Forbes Road, 5852.4 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 1780763, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 1803297 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    514.4 m at 190.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1803297 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 1803145 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    171.2 m at 236.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1803145 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 1801853 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    1911.7 m at 279.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1801853 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1803791 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    49.9 m at 29.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1803791 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 1799763 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    39.0 m at 27.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1799763 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 1798927 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    525.3 m at 267.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1798927 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 1798813 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    336.4 m at 316.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1798813 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 1799991 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1430.2 m at 48.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1799991 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 1779737 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    53.9 m at 37.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1779737 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 1800219 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    59.0 m at 42.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1800219 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 1801321 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    761.4 m at 52.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1801321 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Western Creek
Lot on plan
1780763
Coordinates
-27.65838, 152.59709 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from