Public Trails Computed from official land records

Ipswich · Six Mile Creek

Six Mile Creek from Manning Court

entry is a road 15 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class six-mile-creek--from-manning-court

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Manning Court, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.61141, 152.86396

That is Manning Court, where the walk below begins — 1.8 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.61141, 152.86396

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 2618887 nothing mapped 22.7 m 14.3° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 2622383 nothing mapped 166.1 m 282.4° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 700217 nothing mapped 251.9 m 281.4° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 700141 nothing mapped 159.0 m 5.5° N Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 706107 nothing mapped 159.0 m 5.8° N Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 706563 nothing mapped 91.4 m 336.4° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 700103 nothing mapped 551.1 m 348.4° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Road reserve 704435 nothing mapped 37.4 m 45.8° NE Official spatial — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 704587 nothing mapped 48.0 m 35.4° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 572993 nothing mapped 50.1 m 39.5° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 695277 nothing mapped 169.8 m 350.2° N Statutory inference — evidence class
12 Watercourse bed 696873 nothing mapped 36.0 m 52.3° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
13 Watercourse bed 696835 nothing mapped 89.7 m 60.3° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 1832.2 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 706563 and 704435 is 372.06 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 704435 and 572993 is 4.05 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 704587 and 695277 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 572993 and 696873 is 162.30 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 695277 and 696835 is 31.93 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

15 m up and 30 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 30 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 1684.5 m · height 5.0 to 20.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
15.0 m
Total descent
30.0 m
Steepest sustained
7.7% over 64.6 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
57.7 m 20.0 m
182.1 m 15.0 m
277.3 m 15.0 m
352.9 m 20.0 m
499.8 m 20.0 m
611.4 m 15.0 m
799.0 m 10.0 m
841.3 m 5.0 m
863.6 m 5.0 m
1203.3 m 5.0 m
1253.3 m 5.0 m
1278.8 m 10.0 m
1296.1 m 10.0 m
1298.0 m 10.0 m
1299.0 m 10.0 m
1374.2 m 5.0 m
1558.9 m 5.0 m
1577.0 m 10.0 m
1596.0 m 10.0 m
1621.5 m 5.0 m
1671.4 m 5.0 m
1684.5 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 13 legs from Manning Court, 1832.2 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 696835, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 2618887 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    22.7 m at 14.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2618887 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 2622383 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    166.1 m at 282.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2622383 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 700217 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    251.9 m at 281.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 700217 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 700141 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    159.0 m at 5.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 700141 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 706107 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    159.0 m at 5.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 706107 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 706563 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    91.4 m at 336.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 706563 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 700103 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    551.1 m at 348.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 700103 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 704435 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    37.4 m at 45.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 704435 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 704587 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    48.0 m at 35.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 704587 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 572993 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    50.1 m at 39.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 572993 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 695277 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    169.8 m at 350.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 695277 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 12: 696873 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    36.0 m at 52.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 696873 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 13: 696835 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    89.7 m at 60.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 696835 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Six Mile Creek
Lot on plan
696835
Coordinates
-27.59892, 152.86036 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from