Public Trails Computed from official land records

Ipswich · Reedy Creek

Reedy Creek from Goodger Way

entry is a road 5 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class reedy-creek--from-goodger-way

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Goodger Way, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.63333, 152.75532

That is Goodger Way, where the walk below begins — 1.0 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.63333, 152.75532

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 2774561 nothing mapped 142.2 m 238.5° WSW Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 4742 nothing mapped 24.5 m 160.8° SSE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Watercourse bed 3564 nothing mapped 13.3 m 157.5° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
4 Watercourse bed 2769811 nothing mapped 46.3 m 151.9° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
5 Watercourse bed 5616 nothing mapped 420.8 m 163.8° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
6 Road reserve 4894 nothing mapped 18.6 m 160.1° SSE Official spatial — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 2737739 nothing mapped 217.9 m 153.5° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 2765441 nothing mapped 39.9 m 175.9° S Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Road reserve 2765175 nothing mapped 8.9 m 162.9° SSE Official spatial — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 2763579 nothing mapped 111.5 m 195.6° SSW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 1043.9 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 4742 and 2769811 is 5.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 3564 and 5616 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2769811 and 4894 is 416.65 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 4894 and 2765441 is 99.81 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2737739 and 2765175 is 7.69 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least half an hour out and back

at least a quarter of an hour there at least a quarter of an hour back

5 m up and 10 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 10 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 832.0 m · height 15.0 to 20.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
5.0 m
Total descent
10.0 m
Steepest sustained
9.2% over 54.3 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
66.0 m 20.0 m
151.0 m 15.0 m
417.6 m 15.0 m
430.0 m 15.0 m
638.7 m 15.0 m
639.7 m 15.0 m
646.6 m 15.0 m
777.7 m 20.0 m
787.9 m 20.0 m
797.7 m 15.0 m
832.0 m 15.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 10 legs from Goodger Way, 1043.9 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 610425, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 2774561 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    142.2 m at 238.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2774561 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 4742 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    24.5 m at 160.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 4742 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 3564 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    13.3 m at 157.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 3564 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 4: 2769811 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    46.3 m at 151.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2769811 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 5: 5616 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    420.8 m at 163.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 5616 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 6: 4894 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    18.6 m at 160.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 4894 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 2737739 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    217.9 m at 153.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2737739 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 2765441 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    39.9 m at 175.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2765441 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 2765175 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    8.9 m at 162.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2765175 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 2763579 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    111.5 m at 195.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2763579 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Reedy Creek
Lot on plan
610425
Coordinates
-27.64166, 152.75644 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from