Public Trails Computed from official land records

Ipswich · Guilfoyles Gully

Guilfoyles Gully from Parkland Drive

entry is a road 0 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class guilfoyles-gully--from-parkland-drive

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Parkland Drive, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.60507, 152.65897

That is Parkland Drive, where the walk below begins — 2.4 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.60507, 152.65897

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 729327 nothing mapped 466.0 m 98.6° E Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 2442900 nothing mapped 88.2 m 163.9° SSE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 723323 nothing mapped 15.1 m 189.2° S Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 2442976 nothing mapped 123.7 m 189.2° S Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 723247 nothing mapped 55.0 m 189.2° S Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 2443052 nothing mapped 36.2 m 189.2° S Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 722183 nothing mapped 24.0 m 191.8° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 2443128 nothing mapped 52.7 m 189.0° S Official spatial — evidence class
9 Road reserve 721537 nothing mapped 202.3 m 103.0° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
10 Road reserve 721613 nothing mapped 101.9 m 180.8° S Official spatial — evidence class
11 Road reserve 723969 nothing mapped 463.7 m 100.5° E Official spatial — evidence class
12 Watercourse bed 726249 nothing mapped 152.1 m 72.5° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
13 Road reserve 863011 nothing mapped 12.2 m 43.0° NE Official spatial — evidence class
14 Watercourse bed 863961 nothing mapped 285.6 m 55.2° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
15 Watercourse bed 863923 nothing mapped 131.4 m 62.9° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
16 Watercourse bed 863809 nothing mapped 163.4 m 72.3° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 2373.5 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 723969 and 863011 is 135.78 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 863011 and 863923 is 3.11 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 863961 and 863809 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

0 m up and 20 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 20 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 2373.4 m · height 20.0 to 40.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
0.0 m
Total descent
20.0 m
Steepest sustained
9.7% over 51.4 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
409.3 m 40.0 m
496.2 m 40.0 m
646.8 m 35.0 m
1062.6 m 30.0 m
1063.8 m 30.0 m
1076.2 m 30.0 m
1090.9 m 30.0 m
1275.0 m 30.0 m
1522.9 m 25.0 m
1528.5 m 25.0 m
1533.4 m 25.0 m
1561.0 m 25.0 m
1590.1 m 25.0 m
1641.5 m 20.0 m
1650.8 m 20.0 m
1652.4 m 20.0 m
1654.6 m 20.0 m
2051.0 m 20.0 m
2052.3 m 20.0 m
2055.6 m 20.0 m
2056.0 m 20.0 m
2071.7 m 20.0 m
2077.1 m 20.0 m
2218.9 m 20.0 m
2225.2 m 20.0 m
2343.8 m 20.0 m
2346.2 m 20.0 m
2352.0 m 20.0 m
2352.8 m 20.0 m
2373.4 m 20.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 16 legs from Parkland Drive, 2373.5 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 863809, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 729327 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    466.0 m at 98.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 729327 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 2442900 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    88.2 m at 163.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2442900 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 723323 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    15.1 m at 189.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 723323 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 2442976 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    123.7 m at 189.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2442976 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 723247 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    55.0 m at 189.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 723247 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 2443052 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    36.2 m at 189.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2443052 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 722183 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    24.0 m at 191.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 722183 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 2443128 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    52.7 m at 189.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2443128 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 721537 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    202.3 m at 103.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 721537 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 721613 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    101.9 m at 180.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 721613 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 11: 723969 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    463.7 m at 100.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 723969 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 12: 726249 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    152.1 m at 72.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 726249 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 13: 863011 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    12.2 m at 43.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 863011 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 14: 863961 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    285.6 m at 55.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 863961 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 15: 863923 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    131.4 m at 62.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 863923 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 16: 863809 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    163.4 m at 72.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 863809 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Guilfoyles Gully
Lot on plan
863809
Coordinates
-27.60833, 152.67667 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from