Public Trails Computed from official land records

Ipswich · Goodna Creek

Goodna Creek from Kerwick Street

entry is a road 45 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class goodna-creek--from-kerwick-street

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Kerwick Street, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.60001, 152.87151

That is Kerwick Street, where the walk below begins — 5.7 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.60001, 152.87151

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 682547 nothing mapped 135.6 m 198.5° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 687449 nothing mapped 24.5 m 189.5° S Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 682585 nothing mapped 117.5 m 189.5° S Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 687601 nothing mapped 144.7 m 233.4° SW Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 691439 nothing mapped 43.2 m 222.1° SW Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 687639 nothing mapped 313.0 m 255.1° WSW Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 704435 nothing mapped 744.1 m 297.9° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 695277 nothing mapped 177.2 m 348.2° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 696873 nothing mapped 36.0 m 52.3° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 696835 nothing mapped 23.5 m 46.3° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 573107 nothing mapped 73.5 m 53.9° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
12 Watercourse bed 571891 nothing mapped 50.4 m 43.4° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
13 Watercourse bed 677683 nothing mapped 1039.0 m 31.5° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
14 Watercourse bed 568699 nothing mapped 1539.3 m 53.5° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
15 Watercourse bed 1106134 nothing mapped 1270.3 m 134.8° SE Statutory inference — evidence class
16 Watercourse bed 1106514 nothing mapped 13.0 m 223.0° SW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 5744.8 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 704435 and 696873 is 175.70 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 695277 and 696835 is 31.93 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 696873 and 573107 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 696835 and 571891 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 573107 and 677683 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 571891 and 568699 is 969.89 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 677683 and 1106134 is 1475.44 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 568699 and 1106514 is 1017.58 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 2½ hours out and back

at least 1¼ hours there at least 1¼ hours back

45 m up and 60 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 60 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 4420.6 m · height 5.0 to 40.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
45.0 m
Total descent
60.0 m
Steepest sustained
17.4% over 57.6 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
29.0 m 20.0 m
133.6 m 20.0 m
218.6 m 20.0 m
462.7 m 20.0 m
479.0 m 25.0 m
815.8 m 30.0 m
827.0 m 35.0 m
873.4 m 40.0 m
963.0 m 40.0 m
1039.9 m 35.0 m
1114.5 m 30.0 m
1234.9 m 25.0 m
1292.4 m 20.0 m
1317.2 m 15.0 m
1369.1 m 10.0 m
1407.9 m 10.0 m
1500.2 m 10.0 m
1509.0 m 5.0 m
1554.9 m 5.0 m
1579.9 m 10.0 m
1585.2 m 10.0 m
1610.0 m 5.0 m
1660.1 m 5.0 m
1680.6 m 5.0 m
1687.4 m 5.0 m
1690.1 m 5.0 m
1789.2 m 5.0 m
1815.8 m 5.0 m
3003.4 m 5.0 m
3014.1 m 10.0 m
3049.6 m 15.0 m
3106.1 m 20.0 m
3150.4 m 20.0 m
3186.2 m 15.0 m
3234.0 m 15.0 m
3272.8 m 20.0 m
3299.9 m 20.0 m
3320.7 m 20.0 m
3323.7 m 20.0 m
4308.7 m 15.0 m
4321.8 m 10.0 m
4357.4 m 10.0 m
4407.5 m 10.0 m
4420.6 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 16 legs from Kerwick Street, 5744.8 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 1405916, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 682547 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    135.6 m at 198.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 682547 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 687449 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    24.5 m at 189.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 687449 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 682585 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    117.5 m at 189.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 682585 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 687601 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    144.7 m at 233.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 687601 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 691439 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    43.2 m at 222.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 691439 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 687639 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    313.0 m at 255.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 687639 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 704435 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    744.1 m at 297.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 704435 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 695277 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    177.2 m at 348.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 695277 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 696873 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    36.0 m at 52.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 696873 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 696835 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    23.5 m at 46.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 696835 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 573107 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    73.5 m at 53.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 573107 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 12: 571891 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    50.4 m at 43.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 571891 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 13: 677683 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1039.0 m at 31.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 677683 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 14: 568699 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1539.3 m at 53.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 568699 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 15: 1106134 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1270.3 m at 134.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1106134 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 16: 1106514 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    13.0 m at 223.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1106514 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Goodna Creek
Lot on plan
1405916
Coordinates
-27.59035, 152.88775 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from