Public Trails Computed from official land records

Ipswich · Goodna Creek

Goodna Creek from Albert Street

entry is a road 10 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class goodna-creek--from-albert-street

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Albert Street, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.60599, 152.89447

That is Albert Street, where the walk below begins — 4.1 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.60599, 152.89447

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 1410856 nothing mapped 20.5 m 116.2° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 1177498 nothing mapped 63.9 m 122.8° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 1171266 nothing mapped 132.3 m 124.5° SE Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1175674 nothing mapped 347.0 m 116.5° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 1178220 nothing mapped 20.5 m 111.5° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 1364724 nothing mapped 358.0 m 102.7° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 1365522 nothing mapped 40.0 m 88.4° E Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 1364686 nothing mapped 281.6 m 81.4° E Official spatial — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 1403256 nothing mapped 37.5 m 39.3° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 1399950 nothing mapped 439.5 m 317.0° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 1403864 nothing mapped 352.5 m 316.0° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
12 Watercourse bed 415532 nothing mapped 45.4 m 328.4° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
13 Watercourse bed 1403978 nothing mapped 71.0 m 331.6° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
14 Watercourse bed 481880 nothing mapped 765.6 m 304.6° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
15 Watercourse bed 1405308 nothing mapped 1101.7 m 325.9° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
16 Watercourse bed 1405916 nothing mapped 15.6 m 259.3° W Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 4092.6 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1364686 and 1399950 is 34.37 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1403256 and 1403864 is 432.61 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1399950 and 415532 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1403864 and 1403978 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 415532 and 481880 is 66.98 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1403978 and 1405308 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 481880 and 1405916 is 402.58 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1¾ hours out and back

at least three quarters of an hour there at least 1 hour back

10 m up and 30 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 30 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 4020.1 m · height 5.0 to 25.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
10.0 m
Total descent
30.0 m
Steepest sustained
9.0% over 55.4 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
21.2 m 25.0 m
54.1 m 20.0 m
187.5 m 15.0 m
530.1 m 10.0 m
600.4 m 10.0 m
908.3 m 15.0 m
922.9 m 15.0 m
947.3 m 10.0 m
985.0 m 10.0 m
1239.7 m 10.0 m
1273.6 m 5.0 m
1306.2 m 5.0 m
1361.6 m 10.0 m
1707.7 m 10.0 m
1732.8 m 5.0 m
1770.0 m 5.0 m
1840.6 m 5.0 m
1844.7 m 5.0 m
1861.2 m 5.0 m
1902.1 m 5.0 m
2039.2 m 5.0 m
2355.8 m 5.0 m
2421.5 m 5.0 m
2726.4 m 5.0 m
2814.7 m 5.0 m
3435.7 m 5.0 m
4020.1 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 16 legs from Albert Street, 4092.6 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 1405916, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 1410856 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.5 m at 116.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1410856 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 1177498 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    63.9 m at 122.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1177498 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 1171266 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    132.3 m at 124.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1171266 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1175674 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    347.0 m at 116.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1175674 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 1178220 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.5 m at 111.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1178220 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 1364724 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    358.0 m at 102.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1364724 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 1365522 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    40.0 m at 88.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1365522 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 1364686 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    281.6 m at 81.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1364686 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 1403256 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    37.5 m at 39.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1403256 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 1399950 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    439.5 m at 317.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1399950 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 1403864 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    352.5 m at 316.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1403864 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 12: 415532 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    45.4 m at 328.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 415532 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 13: 1403978 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    71.0 m at 331.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1403978 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 14: 481880 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    765.6 m at 304.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 481880 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 15: 1405308 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1101.7 m at 325.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1405308 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 16: 1405916 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    15.6 m at 259.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1405916 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Goodna Creek
Lot on plan
1405916
Coordinates
-27.59035, 152.88775 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from