Public Trails Computed from official land records

Ipswich · Colleges Crossing

Colleges Crossing from Lilley Terrace

entry is a road 25 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class colleges-crossing--from-lilley-terrace

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Lilley Terrace, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.56625, 152.79783

That is Lilley Terrace, where the walk below begins — 2.3 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.56625, 152.79783

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 1415075 nothing mapped 67.3 m 263.9° W Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 1415227 nothing mapped 53.5 m 202.8° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 1407551 nothing mapped 252.7 m 279.9° W Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1415113 nothing mapped 114.8 m 46.9° NE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 1406449 nothing mapped 40.2 m 8.9° N Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 1404777 nothing mapped 103.2 m 292.4° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 1679897 nothing mapped 525.1 m 3.1° N Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 923127 nothing mapped 41.3 m 1.9° N Official spatial — evidence class
9 Road reserve 1393453 nothing mapped 57.1 m 67.4° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
10 Road reserve 1391021 nothing mapped 160.8 m 21.4° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
11 Road reserve 1389007 nothing mapped 230.9 m 73.7° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
12 Road reserve 1393529 nothing mapped 578.8 m 80.5° E Official spatial — evidence class
13 Watercourse bed 1392313 nothing mapped 53.9 m 337.6° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 2279.6 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

25 m up and 75 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 75 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 2192.1 m · height 5.0 to 55.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
25.0 m
Total descent
75.0 m
Steepest sustained
26.6% over 56.3 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
56.0 m 55.0 m
185.0 m 50.0 m
400.0 m 50.0 m
559.8 m 55.0 m
820.5 m 55.0 m
904.7 m 50.0 m
986.7 m 45.0 m
1054.3 m 40.0 m
1115.1 m 35.0 m
1128.9 m 35.0 m
1197.5 m 40.0 m
1261.4 m 45.0 m
1334.0 m 50.0 m
1445.9 m 55.0 m
1484.3 m 55.0 m
1496.2 m 50.0 m
1524.2 m 45.0 m
1547.6 m 40.0 m
1580.2 m 35.0 m
1604.5 m 30.0 m
1617.2 m 25.0 m
1636.5 m 20.0 m
1668.6 m 15.0 m
1781.4 m 10.0 m
1793.0 m 10.0 m
1956.2 m 10.0 m
2192.1 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 13 legs from Lilley Terrace, 2279.6 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 1392313, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 1415075 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    67.3 m at 263.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1415075 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 1415227 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    53.5 m at 202.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1415227 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 1407551 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    252.7 m at 279.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1407551 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1415113 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    114.8 m at 46.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1415113 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 1406449 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    40.2 m at 8.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1406449 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 1404777 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    103.2 m at 292.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1404777 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 1679897 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    525.1 m at 3.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1679897 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 923127 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    41.3 m at 1.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 923127 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 1393453 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    57.1 m at 67.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1393453 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 1391021 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    160.8 m at 21.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1391021 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 11: 1389007 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    230.9 m at 73.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1389007 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 12: 1393529 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    578.8 m at 80.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1393529 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 13: 1392313 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    53.9 m at 337.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1392313 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Colleges Crossing
Lot on plan
1392313
Coordinates
-27.55639, 152.80361 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
ford

What this approach was read from