Public Trails Computed from official land records

Gold Coast · Wallaby Creek

Wallaby Creek from Hardys Road

entry is a road 15 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class wallaby-creek--from-hardys-road

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Hardys Road, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -28.09609, 153.35724

That is Hardys Road, where the walk below begins — 3.9 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-28.09609, 153.35724

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 472430 nothing mapped 396.6 m 341.9° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 461904 nothing mapped 309.4 m 326.5° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 461790 nothing mapped 612.5 m 312.3° NW Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 462892 nothing mapped 64.1 m 295.8° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 462930 nothing mapped 49.1 m 61.3° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 461714 nothing mapped 106.4 m 64.3° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 2181079 nothing mapped 835.1 m 91.6° E Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 205860 nothing mapped 409.4 m 112.3° ESE Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 508606 nothing mapped 451.7 m 153.9° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 508264 nothing mapped 713.2 m 217.3° SW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 3947.5 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 461714 and 205860 is 823.27 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2181079 and 508606 is 373.72 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 205860 and 508264 is 443.27 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1½ hours out and back

at least three quarters of an hour there at least three quarters of an hour back

15 m up and 30 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 30 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 3801.4 m · height 5.0 to 20.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
15.0 m
Total descent
30.0 m
Steepest sustained
9.7% over 51.5 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
69.4 m 20.0 m
118.1 m 15.0 m
314.7 m 10.0 m
339.1 m 10.0 m
473.3 m 10.0 m
532.7 m 10.0 m
565.9 m 10.0 m
580.6 m 10.0 m
632.2 m 15.0 m
694.3 m 20.0 m
722.6 m 20.0 m
798.1 m 15.0 m
953.7 m 10.0 m
1031.7 m 10.0 m
1081.4 m 15.0 m
1194.8 m 15.0 m
1249.9 m 10.0 m
1272.9 m 10.0 m
1280.6 m 10.0 m
1347.6 m 10.0 m
1428.2 m 10.0 m
1774.8 m 5.0 m
1780.4 m 5.0 m
1953.3 m 5.0 m
1963.0 m 5.0 m
2075.9 m 5.0 m
2083.8 m 5.0 m
2103.3 m 5.0 m
2131.3 m 5.0 m
2144.8 m 5.0 m
2249.0 m 5.0 m
2343.9 m 5.0 m
2384.9 m 5.0 m
2434.1 m 5.0 m
2463.1 m 5.0 m
2525.2 m 5.0 m
2538.2 m 5.0 m
2561.9 m 5.0 m
2577.6 m 5.0 m
2626.7 m 5.0 m
2755.1 m 5.0 m
2764.2 m 5.0 m
2791.5 m 5.0 m
2835.1 m 5.0 m
2935.5 m 5.0 m
2972.7 m 5.0 m
3002.2 m 5.0 m
3201.4 m 5.0 m
3249.4 m 5.0 m
3313.9 m 5.0 m
3367.0 m 5.0 m
3367.1 m 5.0 m
3384.5 m 5.0 m
3390.9 m 5.0 m
3397.4 m 5.0 m
3534.1 m 5.0 m
3543.1 m 5.0 m
3608.7 m 5.0 m
3616.4 m 5.0 m
3793.4 m 5.0 m
3801.4 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 10 legs from Hardys Road, 3947.5 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 508264, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 472430 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    396.6 m at 341.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 472430 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 461904 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    309.4 m at 326.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 461904 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 461790 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    612.5 m at 312.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 461790 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 462892 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    64.1 m at 295.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 462892 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 462930 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    49.1 m at 61.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 462930 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 461714 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    106.4 m at 64.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 461714 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 2181079 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    835.1 m at 91.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2181079 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 205860 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    409.4 m at 112.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 205860 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 508606 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    451.7 m at 153.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 508606 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 508264 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    713.2 m at 217.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 508264 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Wallaby Creek
Lot on plan
508264
Coordinates
-28.09616, 153.36044 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse