Public Trails Computed from official land records

Gold Coast · Tonys Creek

Tonys Creek from Chesters Road

entry is a track 50 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class tonys-creek--from-chesters-road-2

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Chesters Road, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -28.13299, 153.22786

That is Chesters Road, where the walk below begins — 1.9 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-28.13299, 153.22786

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 131608 nothing mapped 665.0 m 14.8° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Protected estate 1AP19371 nothing mapped 86.6 m 42.5° NE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Watercourse bed 131798 nothing mapped 994.7 m 29.4° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
4 Road reserve 147606 nothing mapped 52.1 m 349.9° N Official spatial — evidence class
5 Watercourse bed 147340 nothing mapped 100.7 m 323.1° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 1899.1 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1AP19371 and 147606 is 395.86 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

50 m up and 75 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 75 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 1849.4 m · height 95.0 to 130.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
50.0 m
Total descent
75.0 m
Steepest sustained
28.1% over 53.4 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
48.6 m 120.0 m
127.4 m 115.0 m
233.5 m 115.0 m
257.2 m 115.0 m
345.5 m 115.0 m
373.9 m 120.0 m
468.8 m 120.0 m
470.5 m 120.0 m
505.3 m 125.0 m
519.9 m 130.0 m
566.8 m 130.0 m
587.8 m 125.0 m
615.8 m 120.0 m
633.6 m 115.0 m
683.8 m 110.0 m
746.5 m 105.0 m
775.9 m 100.0 m
778.2 m 95.0 m
794.6 m 95.0 m
797.4 m 100.0 m
817.7 m 105.0 m
831.7 m 110.0 m
872.8 m 115.0 m
898.0 m 120.0 m
989.1 m 120.0 m
1045.8 m 115.0 m
1079.6 m 110.0 m
1096.3 m 110.0 m
1138.3 m 115.0 m
1205.6 m 120.0 m
1391.0 m 120.0 m
1457.9 m 115.0 m
1552.0 m 110.0 m
1654.4 m 105.0 m
1707.1 m 100.0 m
1734.9 m 95.0 m
1756.2 m 95.0 m
1849.4 m 95.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 5 legs from Chesters Road, 1899.1 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 147340, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 131608 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    665.0 m at 14.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 131608 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 1AP19371 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    86.6 m at 42.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1AP19371 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 131798 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    994.7 m at 29.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 131798 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 4: 147606 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    52.1 m at 349.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 147606 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 147340 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    100.7 m at 323.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 147340 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Tonys Creek
Lot on plan
147340
Coordinates
-28.11760, 153.23444 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse