Public Trails Computed from official land records

Gold Coast · Small Creek

Small Creek from Easement Break

entry is a track 60 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class small-creek--from-easement-break

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Easement Break, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.98288, 153.32843

That is Easement Break, where the walk below begins — 2.5 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.98288, 153.32843

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Protected estate 1AP14652 nothing mapped 861.1 m 89.4° E Official spatial — evidence class
2 Protected estate 224NPW804 nothing mapped 90.5 m 9.8° N Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 1217384 nothing mapped 66.1 m 99.8° E Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1223920 North Street open 156.4 m 190.9° S Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 1216776 nothing mapped 200.2 m 178.7° S Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 1305240 nothing mapped 110.5 m 99.3° E Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 1306380 nothing mapped 181.9 m 69.8° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 1305392 nothing mapped 110.7 m 142.7° SE Official spatial — evidence class
9 Road reserve 1151188 nothing mapped 57.6 m 149.8° SSE Official spatial — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 1146248 nothing mapped 618.4 m 93.8° E Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 1153810 nothing mapped 50.6 m 0.7° N Statutory inference — evidence class
Total 127.1 m mapped 2504.0 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1151188 and 1153810 is 541.80 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No steps, but the record maps ground here

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

60 m up and 80 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 80 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

What is mapped along this chain

A managing authority has surveyed a way along 127 m of this 2504 m chain — about 5% of it. That is a statement about what is on the ground, not about your right to be there, which the parcels above already settled, and not a direction: no step below is measured along any of these ways.

  • Leg 4 North Street Official spatial — evidence class

    127 m along it · the managing authority publishes it as open to the public .

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 2198.1 m · height 5.0 to 60.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
60.0 m
Total descent
80.0 m
Steepest sustained
26.5% over 56.7 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
4.8 m 25.0 m
27.2 m 30.0 m
54.3 m 35.0 m
76.7 m 40.0 m
95.2 m 45.0 m
120.3 m 50.0 m
139.8 m 55.0 m
165.9 m 60.0 m
215.2 m 60.0 m
243.0 m 55.0 m
263.6 m 50.0 m
281.6 m 45.0 m
300.0 m 40.0 m
320.3 m 35.0 m
350.5 m 30.0 m
387.1 m 25.0 m
429.8 m 20.0 m
564.3 m 15.0 m
720.3 m 15.0 m
787.7 m 20.0 m
825.8 m 25.0 m
859.2 m 30.0 m
934.9 m 35.0 m
973.3 m 35.0 m
994.4 m 30.0 m
1025.1 m 25.0 m
1262.1 m 20.0 m
1349.1 m 15.0 m
1376.6 m 15.0 m
1438.2 m 15.0 m
1495.1 m 10.0 m
1638.1 m 5.0 m
1721.9 m 5.0 m
1736.1 m 10.0 m
1810.4 m 10.0 m
1821.4 m 5.0 m
2139.0 m 5.0 m
2198.1 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 11 legs from Easement Break, 2504.0 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 1153810, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 1AP14652 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    861.1 m at 89.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1AP14652 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 224NPW804 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    90.5 m at 9.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 224NPW804 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 1217384 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    66.1 m at 99.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1217384 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1223920 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    156.4 m at 190.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1223920 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 1216776 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    200.2 m at 178.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1216776 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 1305240 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    110.5 m at 99.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1305240 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 1306380 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    181.9 m at 69.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1306380 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 1305392 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    110.7 m at 142.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1305392 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 1151188 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    57.6 m at 149.8°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1151188 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 1146248 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    618.4 m at 93.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1146248 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 1153810 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    50.6 m at 0.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1153810 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Small Creek
Lot on plan
1153810
Coordinates
-27.98604, 153.34785 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse