Public Trails Computed from official land records

Gold Coast · Main Beach

Main Beach from Radford Street

entry is a road 0 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class main-beach--from-radford-street

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Radford Street, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.97961, 153.41466

That is Radford Street, where the walk below begins — 11.8 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.97961, 153.41466

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Watercourse bed 2966639 nothing mapped 253.1 m 96.8° E Statutory inference — evidence class
2 Watercourse bed 2896719 nothing mapped 565.1 m 35.9° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
3 Road reserve 2969375 nothing mapped 16.0 m 29.2° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
4 Watercourse bed 2896985 nothing mapped 5.4 m 35.1° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
5 Road reserve 2966031 nothing mapped 61.8 m 30.9° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
6 Watercourse bed 2896947 nothing mapped 101.6 m 62.1° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 3285832 nothing mapped 1165.5 m 354.9° N Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 2490895 nothing mapped 1395.0 m 356.3° N Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 2490857 nothing mapped 1296.2 m 1.4° N Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 2490781 nothing mapped 538.2 m 39.8° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 2490971 nothing mapped 572.4 m 81.7° E Statutory inference — evidence class
12 Watercourse bed 3284046 nothing mapped 1111.7 m 99.1° E Statutory inference — evidence class
13 Watercourse bed 2686914 nothing mapped 4699.2 m 193.3° SSW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 11781.2 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2966639 and 2969375 is 537.03 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2969375 and 2966031 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2966031 and 3285832 is 7.35 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2896947 and 2490895 is 1127.44 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 3285832 and 2490857 is 1376.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2490895 and 2490781 is 1284.70 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2490857 and 2490971 is 316.58 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2490781 and 3284046 is 552.26 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2490971 and 2686914 is 32.38 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 5 hours out and back

at least 2½ hours there at least 2½ hours back

0 m up and 0 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 0 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 21.1 m · height 5.0 to 5.0 m Read off an unstated interval along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
0.0 m
Total descent
0.0 m
Steepest sustained
not published — the route is too short to sustain one
Contour interval
not stated by the layer
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
16.5 m 5.0 m
21.1 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of an unstated interval cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 13 legs from Radford Street, 11781.2 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below

    Parcel not resolved, recorded tenure "unresolved". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 2966639 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    253.1 m at 96.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2966639 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 2: 2896719 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    565.1 m at 35.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2896719 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 3: 2969375 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    16.0 m at 29.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2969375 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 2896985 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    5.4 m at 35.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2896985 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 5: 2966031 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    61.8 m at 30.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2966031 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 2896947 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    101.6 m at 62.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2896947 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 7: 3285832 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1165.5 m at 354.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 3285832 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 2490895 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1395.0 m at 356.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2490895 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 2490857 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1296.2 m at 1.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2490857 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 2490781 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    538.2 m at 39.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2490781 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 2490971 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    572.4 m at 81.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2490971 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 12: 3284046 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    1111.7 m at 99.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 3284046 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 13: 2686914 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    4699.2 m at 193.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2686914 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Main Beach
Lot on plan
not established from the cadastre
Coordinates
-27.97833, 153.42972 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
beach