Public Trails Computed from official land records

Gold Coast · Deepwater Point

Deepwater Point from Morala Avenue

entry is a road chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class deepwater-point--from-morala-avenue

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Morala Avenue, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.92910, 153.39809

That is Morala Avenue, where the walk below begins — 3.2 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.92910, 153.39809

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 1047944 nothing mapped 46.8 m 130.4° SE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Watercourse bed 1154648 nothing mapped 303.1 m 142.8° SE Statutory inference — evidence class
3 Watercourse bed 1148872 nothing mapped 236.9 m 84.0° E Statutory inference — evidence class
4 Watercourse bed 1112924 nothing mapped 366.4 m 14.1° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
5 Watercourse bed 1004776 nothing mapped 292.3 m 34.9° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
6 Road reserve 1005650 nothing mapped 14.2 m 20.0° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 3285984 nothing mapped 598.6 m 159.2° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 3286022 nothing mapped 903.2 m 165.0° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 3285946 nothing mapped 275.8 m 158.5° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 3285908 nothing mapped 192.3 m 191.2° S Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 3229.6 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1047944 and 1148872 is 284.12 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1154648 and 1112924 is 90.51 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1148872 and 1004776 is 339.84 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1112924 and 1005650 is 172.86 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1005650 and 3286022 is 321.26 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 3285984 and 3285946 is 807.64 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 3286022 and 3285908 is 163.17 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track. The climb on this route could not be measured, so the figure is flat-ground time and the real walk is longer.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing No contour cover along this line

No profile is published for this route. The contour layer does not cross its line often enough to describe a climb, and a profile drawn from anything else would be a guess about the ground.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 10 legs from Morala Avenue, 3229.6 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 3285908, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 1047944 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    46.8 m at 130.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1047944 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 1154648 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    303.1 m at 142.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1154648 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 3: 1148872 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    236.9 m at 84.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1148872 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 4: 1112924 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    366.4 m at 14.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1112924 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 5: 1004776 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    292.3 m at 34.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1004776 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 6: 1005650 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    14.2 m at 20.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1005650 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 3285984 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    598.6 m at 159.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 3285984 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 3286022 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    903.2 m at 165.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 3286022 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 3285946 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    275.8 m at 158.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 3285946 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 3285908 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    192.3 m at 191.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 3285908 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Deepwater Point
Lot on plan
3285908
Coordinates
-27.94278, 153.41056 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
point