Public Trails Computed from official land records

Gold Coast · Currumbin Creek

Currumbin Creek from Jewel Street

entry is a road 0 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class currumbin-creek--from-jewel-street

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Jewel Street, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -28.14016, 153.47401

That is Jewel Street, where the walk below begins — 1.5 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-28.14016, 153.47401

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 609681 nothing mapped 56.8 m 328.5° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 610327 nothing mapped 128.0 m 342.9° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 593797 nothing mapped 40.3 m 27.0° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 567615 nothing mapped 110.4 m 53.1° NE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Watercourse bed 569705 nothing mapped 65.5 m 22.3° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
6 Watercourse bed 2790129 nothing mapped 850.5 m 42.1° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 2790167 nothing mapped 30.0 m 45.7° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 2790205 nothing mapped 30.0 m 45.7° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 2702843 nothing mapped 141.3 m 32.3° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 1452.8 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 567615 and 2790129 is 51.79 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 569705 and 2790167 is 835.54 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2790129 and 2790205 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2790167 and 2702843 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least half an hour out and back

at least a quarter of an hour there at least a quarter of an hour back

0 m up and 0 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 0 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 217.8 m · height 5.0 to 5.0 m Read off an unstated interval along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
0.0 m
Total descent
0.0 m
Steepest sustained
0.0% over 108.2 m
Contour interval
not stated by the layer
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
109.5 m 5.0 m
217.8 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of an unstated interval cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 9 legs from Jewel Street, 1452.8 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 2702843, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 609681 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    56.8 m at 328.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 609681 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 610327 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    128.0 m at 342.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 610327 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 593797 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    40.3 m at 27.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 593797 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 567615 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    110.4 m at 53.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 567615 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 569705 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    65.5 m at 22.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 569705 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 6: 2790129 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    850.5 m at 42.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2790129 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 7: 2790167 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    30.0 m at 45.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2790167 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 2790205 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    30.0 m at 45.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2790205 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 2702843 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    141.3 m at 32.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2702843 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Currumbin Creek
Lot on plan
2702843
Coordinates
-28.13000, 153.48167 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse