Public Trails Computed from official land records

Gold Coast · Baker Creek

Baker Creek from Hart Street

entry is a road 20 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class baker-creek--from-hart-street

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Hart Street, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.89090, 153.28640

That is Hart Street, where the walk below begins — 4.2 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.89090, 153.28640

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 2301202 nothing mapped 111.5 m 4.4° N Official spatial — evidence class
2 Watercourse bed 2301126 nothing mapped 535.4 m 32.5° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
3 Watercourse bed 2301164 nothing mapped 584.8 m 92.9° E Statutory inference — evidence class
4 Watercourse bed 1286487 nothing mapped 610.0 m 199.2° SSW Statutory inference — evidence class
5 Watercourse bed 2731074 nothing mapped 316.0 m 214.4° SW Statutory inference — evidence class
6 Watercourse bed 2731150 nothing mapped 640.9 m 242.8° WSW Statutory inference — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 2740460 nothing mapped 270.2 m 157.7° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 2748136 nothing mapped 434.5 m 129.8° SE Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Road reserve 2744184 nothing mapped 72.5 m 167.2° SSE Official spatial — evidence class
10 Road reserve 2744108 nothing mapped 298.1 m 149.2° SSE Official spatial — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 2744374 nothing mapped 206.5 m 220.0° SW Statutory inference — evidence class
12 Watercourse bed 2698394 nothing mapped 150.7 m 224.2° SW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 4231.1 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2301202 and 2301164 is 524.31 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2301126 and 1286487 is 425.97 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2301164 and 2731074 is 512.04 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1286487 and 2731150 is 256.37 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2731074 and 2740460 is 519.29 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2731150 and 2748136 is 202.68 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2740460 and 2744184 is 64.16 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2744108 and 2698394 is 16.64 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 2 hours out and back

at least 1 hour there at least 1 hour back

20 m up and 30 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 30 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 3849.0 m · height 5.0 to 25.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
20.0 m
Total descent
30.0 m
Steepest sustained
38.4% over 52.0 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
4.5 m 15.0 m
47.5 m 10.0 m
92.9 m 5.0 m
794.9 m 5.0 m
803.1 m 10.0 m
812.8 m 15.0 m
823.9 m 20.0 m
853.4 m 20.0 m
857.2 m 20.0 m
861.5 m 20.0 m
865.3 m 20.0 m
879.1 m 25.0 m
906.4 m 25.0 m
922.8 m 20.0 m
937.2 m 15.0 m
950.2 m 10.0 m
958.5 m 5.0 m
1567.0 m 5.0 m
1580.1 m 5.0 m
1691.3 m 5.0 m
1695.9 m 5.0 m
1716.2 m 5.0 m
1759.0 m 5.0 m
2278.8 m 5.0 m
2417.4 m 5.0 m
3540.9 m 5.0 m
3849.0 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 12 legs from Hart Street, 4231.1 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 2698394, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 2301202 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    111.5 m at 4.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2301202 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 2301126 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    535.4 m at 32.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2301126 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 3: 2301164 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    584.8 m at 92.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2301164 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 4: 1286487 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    610.0 m at 199.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1286487 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 5: 2731074 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    316.0 m at 214.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2731074 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 6: 2731150 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    640.9 m at 242.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2731150 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 7: 2740460 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    270.2 m at 157.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2740460 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 2748136 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    434.5 m at 129.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2748136 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 2744184 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    72.5 m at 167.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2744184 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 2744108 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    298.1 m at 149.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2744108 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 11: 2744374 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    206.5 m at 220.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2744374 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 12: 2698394 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    150.7 m at 224.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2698394 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Baker Creek
Lot on plan
2698394
Coordinates
-27.90640, 153.28943 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse