Public Trails Computed from official land records

Brisbane · Nundah Creek

Nundah Creek from Forbes Street

entry is a road chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class nundah-creek--from-forbes-street

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Forbes Street, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.32344, 153.07885

That is Forbes Street, where the walk below begins — 2.5 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.32344, 153.07885

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 1881848 nothing mapped 20.2 m 279.1° W Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 1882456 nothing mapped 75.6 m 255.9° WSW Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 1880860 nothing mapped 38.5 m 212.6° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1892906 nothing mapped 38.2 m 346.2° NNW Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 1884508 nothing mapped 252.3 m 295.6° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 1887776 nothing mapped 20.1 m 279.3° W Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 1884318 nothing mapped 60.6 m 279.3° W Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 1887548 nothing mapped 29.7 m 279.3° W Official spatial — evidence class
9 Road reserve 1885496 nothing mapped 30.2 m 279.3° W Official spatial — evidence class
10 Road reserve 1953972 nothing mapped 50.0 m 207.1° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
11 Road reserve 1954010 nothing mapped 46.8 m 189.4° S Official spatial — evidence class
12 Road reserve 1953896 nothing mapped 378.5 m 189.4° S Official spatial — evidence class
13 Road reserve 1877706 nothing mapped 85.8 m 189.4° S Official spatial — evidence class
14 Watercourse bed 1859314 nothing mapped 249.5 m 161.4° SSE Statutory inference — evidence class
15 Watercourse bed 1860340 nothing mapped 253.3 m 133.9° SE Statutory inference — evidence class
16 Watercourse bed 1860606 nothing mapped 597.8 m 141.6° SE Statutory inference — evidence class
17 Watercourse bed 663336 nothing mapped 259.9 m 74.2° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
18 Watercourse bed 683704 nothing mapped 34.8 m 105.6° ESE Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 2521.8 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1877706 and 1860340 is 219.34 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1859314 and 1860606 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1860340 and 663336 is 511.79 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1860606 and 683704 is 252.03 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track. The climb on this route could not be measured, so the figure is flat-ground time and the real walk is longer.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing No contour cover along this line

No profile is published for this route. The contour layer does not cross its line often enough to describe a climb, and a profile drawn from anything else would be a guess about the ground.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 18 legs from Forbes Street, 2521.8 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 683704, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 1881848 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.2 m at 279.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1881848 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 1882456 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    75.6 m at 255.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1882456 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 1880860 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    38.5 m at 212.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1880860 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1892906 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    38.2 m at 346.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1892906 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 1884508 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    252.3 m at 295.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1884508 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 1887776 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.1 m at 279.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1887776 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 1884318 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    60.6 m at 279.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1884318 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 1887548 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    29.7 m at 279.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1887548 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 1885496 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    30.2 m at 279.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1885496 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 1953972 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    50.0 m at 207.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1953972 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 11: 1954010 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    46.8 m at 189.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1954010 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 12: 1953896 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    378.5 m at 189.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1953896 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 13: 1877706 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    85.8 m at 189.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1877706 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 14: 1859314 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    249.5 m at 161.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1859314 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 15: 1860340 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    253.3 m at 133.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1860340 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 16: 1860606 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    597.8 m at 141.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1860606 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 17: 663336 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    259.9 m at 74.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 663336 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 18: 683704 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    34.8 m at 105.6°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 683704 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Nundah Creek
Lot on plan
683704
Coordinates
-27.33470, 153.08209 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from