Public Trails Computed from official land records

Brisbane · Mount Ommaney Creek

Mount Ommaney Creek from Centenary Highway

entry is a road 10 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class mount-ommaney-creek--from-centenary-highway

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Centenary Highway, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.54705, 152.94090

That is Centenary Highway, where the walk below begins — 5.4 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.54705, 152.94090

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 2902779 nothing mapped 223.1 m 29.7° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 2902741 nothing mapped 157.9 m 25.7° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 2902703 nothing mapped 319.3 m 31.6° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 2902665 nothing mapped 227.9 m 30.7° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 2763931 nothing mapped 247.6 m 15.5° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
6 Watercourse bed 2762867 nothing mapped 601.0 m 351.9° N Statutory inference — evidence class
7 Road reserve 337144 nothing mapped 21.3 m 28.7° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 334180 nothing mapped 415.7 m 5.7° N Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 2268112 nothing mapped 143.7 m 294.5° WNW Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 2356842 nothing mapped 325.2 m 272.0° W Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 2268758 nothing mapped 531.1 m 271.2° W Statutory inference — evidence class
12 Watercourse bed 2268872 nothing mapped 810.6 m 253.7° WSW Statutory inference — evidence class
13 Watercourse bed 2079247 nothing mapped 380.5 m 197.9° SSW Statutory inference — evidence class
14 Watercourse bed 2407073 nothing mapped 740.8 m 183.9° S Statutory inference — evidence class
15 Watercourse bed 2071419 nothing mapped 276.9 m 197.3° SSW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 5422.6 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2763931 and 337144 is 471.85 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 337144 and 2268112 is 404.79 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 334180 and 2356842 is 118.63 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2268112 and 2268758 is 321.71 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2356842 and 2268872 is 501.16 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2268758 and 2079247 is 755.60 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2268872 and 2407073 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2079247 and 2071419 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 2 hours out and back

at least 1 hour there at least 1 hour back

10 m up and 30 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 30 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 3895.4 m · height 5.0 to 25.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
10.0 m
Total descent
30.0 m
Steepest sustained
8.0% over 62.3 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
293.8 m 25.0 m
460.6 m 20.0 m
564.0 m 15.0 m
674.9 m 10.0 m
1085.3 m 5.0 m
1192.9 m 5.0 m
1236.7 m 5.0 m
1261.5 m 5.0 m
1335.7 m 10.0 m
1500.9 m 10.0 m
1748.8 m 5.0 m
1781.0 m 5.0 m
1797.1 m 5.0 m
3517.9 m 5.0 m
3580.2 m 10.0 m
3689.9 m 10.0 m
3691.8 m 10.0 m
3787.7 m 10.0 m
3895.4 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 15 legs from Centenary Highway, 5422.6 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 2406655, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 2902779 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    223.1 m at 29.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2902779 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 2902741 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    157.9 m at 25.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2902741 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 2902703 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    319.3 m at 31.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2902703 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 2902665 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    227.9 m at 30.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2902665 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 2763931 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    247.6 m at 15.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2763931 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 2762867 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    601.0 m at 351.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2762867 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 7: 337144 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    21.3 m at 28.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 337144 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 334180 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    415.7 m at 5.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 334180 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 2268112 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    143.7 m at 294.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2268112 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 2356842 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    325.2 m at 272.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2356842 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 2268758 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    531.1 m at 271.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2268758 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 12: 2268872 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    810.6 m at 253.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2268872 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 13: 2079247 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    380.5 m at 197.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2079247 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 14: 2407073 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    740.8 m at 183.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2407073 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 15: 2071419 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    276.9 m at 197.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2071419 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Mount Ommaney Creek
Lot on plan
2406655
Coordinates
-27.54201, 152.92553 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from