Public Trails Computed from official land records

Brisbane · Jindalee Creek

Jindalee Creek from Kersley Road

entry is a road 20 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class jindalee-creek--from-kersley-road

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Kersley Road, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.51951, 152.94585

That is Kersley Road, where the walk below begins — 2.3 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.51951, 152.94585

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 2485130 nothing mapped 162.3 m 85.4° E Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 2486650 nothing mapped 212.0 m 75.3° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 2489120 nothing mapped 215.3 m 68.9° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 2450816 nothing mapped 158.2 m 74.3° ENE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 2450094 nothing mapped 33.1 m 132.6° SE Official spatial — evidence class
6 Road reserve 2450930 nothing mapped 159.0 m 224.6° SW Official spatial — evidence class
7 Road reserve 2430638 nothing mapped 92.6 m 212.4° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
8 Road reserve 2435046 nothing mapped 23.3 m 249.6° WSW Official spatial — evidence class
9 Road reserve 2435692 nothing mapped 185.1 m 254.1° WSW Official spatial — evidence class
10 Road reserve 2438846 nothing mapped 20.7 m 266.3° W Official spatial — evidence class
11 Road reserve 2439606 nothing mapped 89.0 m 240.2° WSW Official spatial — evidence class
12 Road reserve 2439644 nothing mapped 400.8 m 193.7° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
13 Road reserve 2288290 nothing mapped 21.2 m 197.5° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
14 Road reserve 2287834 nothing mapped 135.1 m 194.2° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
15 Road reserve 2286048 nothing mapped 140.9 m 194.0° SSW Official spatial — evidence class
16 Watercourse bed 2286542 nothing mapped 111.3 m 217.8° SW Statutory inference — evidence class
17 Watercourse bed 2268112 nothing mapped 95.1 m 212.2° SSW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 2255.0 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 2286048 and 2268112 is 107.57 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

20 m up and 55 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 55 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 2040.2 m · height 5.0 to 40.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
20.0 m
Total descent
55.0 m
Steepest sustained
17.3% over 86.8 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
39.6 m 40.0 m
55.4 m 40.0 m
106.7 m 40.0 m
394.5 m 35.0 m
486.5 m 35.0 m
580.1 m 35.0 m
649.6 m 30.0 m
702.3 m 25.0 m
733.7 m 20.0 m
857.4 m 20.0 m
877.5 m 20.0 m
905.2 m 20.0 m
970.1 m 20.0 m
1003.3 m 15.0 m
1030.4 m 15.0 m
1106.2 m 15.0 m
1113.5 m 15.0 m
1331.6 m 20.0 m
1508.9 m 25.0 m
1563.8 m 30.0 m
1661.6 m 35.0 m
1766.9 m 35.0 m
1825.8 m 30.0 m
1891.3 m 25.0 m
1953.4 m 20.0 m
2012.1 m 15.0 m
2023.3 m 10.0 m
2040.2 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 17 legs from Kersley Road, 2255.0 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 2268112, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 2485130 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    162.3 m at 85.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2485130 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 2486650 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    212.0 m at 75.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2486650 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 2489120 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    215.3 m at 68.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2489120 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 2450816 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    158.2 m at 74.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2450816 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 2450094 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    33.1 m at 132.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2450094 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 2450930 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    159.0 m at 224.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2450930 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 7: 2430638 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    92.6 m at 212.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2430638 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 8: 2435046 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    23.3 m at 249.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2435046 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 9: 2435692 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    185.1 m at 254.1°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2435692 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 2438846 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.7 m at 266.3°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2438846 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 11: 2439606 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    89.0 m at 240.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2439606 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 12: 2439644 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    400.8 m at 193.7°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2439644 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 13: 2288290 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    21.2 m at 197.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2288290 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 14: 2287834 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    135.1 m at 194.2°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2287834 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 15: 2286048 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    140.9 m at 194.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 2286048 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 16: 2286542 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    111.3 m at 217.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2286542 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 17: 2268112 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    95.1 m at 212.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2268112 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Jindalee Creek
Lot on plan
2268112
Coordinates
-27.52833, 152.94583 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from