Public Trails Computed from official land records

Brisbane · Fish Creek

Fish Creek from Acacia Drive

entry is a road 15 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class fish-creek--from-acacia-drive

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Acacia Drive, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.44314, 152.97459

That is Acacia Drive, where the walk below begins — 2.5 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.44314, 152.97459

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Watercourse bed 691069 nothing mapped 29.8 m 119.7° ESE Statutory inference — evidence class
2 Watercourse bed 887074 nothing mapped 500.9 m 186.7° S Statutory inference — evidence class
3 Watercourse bed 4435330 nothing mapped 461.5 m 281.8° WNW Statutory inference — evidence class
4 Watercourse bed 4336340 nothing mapped 359.8 m 289.1° WNW Statutory inference — evidence class
5 Watercourse bed 4336416 nothing mapped 32.6 m 295.0° WNW Statutory inference — evidence class
6 Watercourse bed 4300544 nothing mapped 335.9 m 277.2° W Statutory inference — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 4313502 nothing mapped 376.1 m 273.8° W Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 4314300 nothing mapped 401.6 m 276.2° W Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 4316580 nothing mapped 14.4 m 335.5° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 2512.6 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 691069 and 4435330 is 419.97 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 887074 and 4336340 is 456.87 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 4435330 and 4336416 is 327.36 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 4336340 and 4300544 is 0.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 4336416 and 4313502 is 335.73 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 4300544 and 4314300 is 368.24 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 4313502 and 4316580 is 388.87 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

15 m up and 5 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 5 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 2490.8 m · height 20.0 to 30.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
15.0 m
Total descent
5.0 m
Steepest sustained
8.9% over 56.3 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
32.8 m 20.0 m
209.4 m 25.0 m
427.9 m 25.0 m
458.8 m 25.0 m
503.1 m 25.0 m
519.8 m 20.0 m
525.4 m 20.0 m
536.0 m 20.0 m
562.7 m 20.0 m
659.8 m 25.0 m
664.6 m 25.0 m
674.3 m 25.0 m
924.1 m 25.0 m
1445.3 m 25.0 m
1544.3 m 25.0 m
1562.7 m 25.0 m
1619.0 m 30.0 m
1681.5 m 30.0 m
1761.7 m 30.0 m
1973.2 m 30.0 m
2302.5 m 30.0 m
2490.8 m 30.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 9 legs from Acacia Drive, 2512.6 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 4316580, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 691069 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    29.8 m at 119.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 691069 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 2: 887074 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    500.9 m at 186.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 887074 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 3: 4435330 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    461.5 m at 281.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 4435330 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 4: 4336340 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    359.8 m at 289.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 4336340 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 5: 4336416 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    32.6 m at 295.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 4336416 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 6: 4300544 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    335.9 m at 277.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 4300544 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 7: 4313502 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    376.1 m at 273.8°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 4313502 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 4314300 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    401.6 m at 276.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 4314300 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 4316580 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    14.4 m at 335.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 4316580 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Fish Creek
Lot on plan
4316580
Coordinates
-27.44460, 152.95469 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from