Public Trails Computed from official land records

Brisbane · Bridgewater Creek

Bridgewater Creek from Flower Street

entry is a road chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class bridgewater-creek--from-flower-street

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Flower Street, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.49216, 153.04353

That is Flower Street, where the walk below begins — 2.3 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.49216, 153.04353

An ordinary car reaches the start The roads layer marks the road reaching this point as trafficable by an ordinary vehicle.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Road reserve 1619571 nothing mapped 20.2 m 13.9° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
2 Road reserve 1608475 nothing mapped 92.5 m 19.6° NNE Official spatial — evidence class
3 Road reserve 1615885 nothing mapped 79.7 m 99.5° E Official spatial — evidence class
4 Road reserve 1613073 nothing mapped 20.1 m 101.4° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
5 Road reserve 1640661 nothing mapped 55.5 m 85.0° E Official spatial — evidence class
6 Watercourse bed 1678927 nothing mapped 388.0 m 79.5° E Statutory inference — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 1679307 nothing mapped 33.6 m 97.3° E Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 1678889 nothing mapped 120.8 m 111.4° ESE Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Watercourse bed 1718523 nothing mapped 207.3 m 63.2° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 1716243 nothing mapped 90.9 m 2.1° N Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Road reserve 1715597 nothing mapped 198.3 m 286.5° WNW Official spatial — evidence class
12 Road reserve 1716699 nothing mapped 11.6 m 280.9° W Official spatial — evidence class
13 Watercourse bed 1694963 nothing mapped 77.0 m 17.3° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
14 Watercourse bed 1715407 nothing mapped 266.4 m 69.2° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
15 Watercourse bed 1712671 nothing mapped 488.3 m 19.9° NNE Statutory inference — evidence class
16 Watercourse bed 1730037 nothing mapped 137.3 m 110.4° ESE Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 2287.5 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1640661 and 1679307 is 369.38 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1678927 and 1678889 is 20.88 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1679307 and 1718523 is 87.39 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1678889 and 1716243 is 86.36 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1718523 and 1715597 is 78.34 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1716699 and 1715407 is 42.76 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1694963 and 1712671 is 90.85 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 1715407 and 1730037 is 464.67 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track. The climb on this route could not be measured, so the figure is flat-ground time and the real walk is longer.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing No contour cover along this line

No profile is published for this route. The contour layer does not cross its line often enough to describe a climb, and a profile drawn from anything else would be a guess about the ground.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 16 legs from Flower Street, 2287.5 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 1730037, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 1619571 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.2 m at 13.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1619571 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 2: 1608475 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    92.5 m at 19.6°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1608475 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 3: 1615885 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    79.7 m at 99.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1615885 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 1613073 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.1 m at 101.4°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1613073 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 5: 1640661 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    55.5 m at 85.0°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1640661 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 6: 1678927 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    388.0 m at 79.5°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1678927 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 7: 1679307 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    33.6 m at 97.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1679307 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 1678889 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    120.8 m at 111.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1678889 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 1718523 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    207.3 m at 63.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1718523 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 10: 1716243 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    90.9 m at 2.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1716243 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 1715597 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    198.3 m at 286.5°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1715597 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 12: 1716699 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    11.6 m at 280.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 1716699 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 13: 1694963 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    77.0 m at 17.3°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1694963 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 14: 1715407 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    266.4 m at 69.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1715407 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 15: 1712671 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    488.3 m at 19.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1712671 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 16: 1730037 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    137.3 m at 110.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 1730037 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Bridgewater Creek
Lot on plan
1730037
Coordinates
-27.48369, 153.05639 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from