Public Trails Computed from official land records

Brisbane · Albany Creek

Albany Creek from Faheys Road East

entry is a road 10 m of climb chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class albany-creek--from-faheys-road-east

Access verdict · Lawful, with caveats · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference

A lawful approach from Faheys Road East, with caveats.

The chain below runs entirely across land the public has an established right to be on. It is a legal line, not a path: nothing here has been surveyed on the ground.

What this verdict means · what the evidence grades mean

On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.

Getting to the start The trailhead coordinate, not the feature

The start is at -27.35077, 152.97253

That is Faheys Road East, where the walk below begins — 2.9 km of it. Every link here goes to that coordinate and never to the feature itself, because a driving route to a waterfall is a driving route into the country above one.

-27.35077, 152.97253

The record does not say what reaches the start The roads layer leaves trafficability unstated on most of its rows, and it is unstated here. That is an absence of evidence, not an ordinary road: treat the last stretch as unresearched.

The coordinate is where the recorded way begins, read off the same layers as the walk. What the record says about a vehicle is above, and it describes this point rather than the drive to it. Whether the road is sealed, gated, or open today, and where a car may lawfully be left, are none of them things these records say — so treat the last few kilometres as unresearched, and the mapping service's route to them as its own work, not ours.

The chain, leg by leg Computed from cadastral geometry; never walked

Legs of the computed corridor, in order, with the grade of the record that made each one lawful
# Runs along Parcel / reference Mapped along it Distance Bearing Evidence
1 Watercourse bed 454065 nothing mapped 43.8 m 308.0° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
2 Watercourse bed 177591 nothing mapped 529.6 m 5.7° N Statutory inference — evidence class
3 Road reserve 177553 nothing mapped 4.5 m 280.9° W Official spatial — evidence class
4 Watercourse bed 178503 nothing mapped 64.6 m 323.7° NW Statutory inference — evidence class
5 Watercourse bed 221063 nothing mapped 344.9 m 329.9° NNW Statutory inference — evidence class
6 Watercourse bed 425565 nothing mapped 234.7 m 77.4° ENE Statutory inference — evidence class
7 Watercourse bed 203545 nothing mapped 438.8 m 39.9° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
8 Watercourse bed 403867 nothing mapped 497.9 m 43.9° NE Statutory inference — evidence class
9 Road reserve 405311 nothing mapped 20.8 m 121.9° ESE Official spatial — evidence class
10 Watercourse bed 407515 nothing mapped 177.8 m 127.0° SE Statutory inference — evidence class
11 Watercourse bed 314339 nothing mapped 508.2 m 103.1° ESE Statutory inference — evidence class
12 Watercourse bed 2521008 nothing mapped 11.2 m 116.2° ESE Statutory inference — evidence class
Total no way mapped 2876.8 m Chain confidence Statutory inference — evidence class

Every leg above is computed from cadastral geometry. Nobody has walked it, and no part of it is a path on the ground: it is the line along which the public record establishes a right to be. Where a leg names a way, that is what a managing authority has mapped down the same ground — it says nothing more about your right to be there, which the parcel already settled.

Caveats — what has to be said before walking this

  • Corner-point junction. Two parcels in the chain meet at a single survey point. They are legally continuous public land, but the junction has no width on the ground.
  • Watercourse crossing. The chain crosses a watercourse bed. The bed is State land by statutory inference, there is no structure, and the crossing is off in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 454065 and 177553 is 511.18 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 177553 and 221063 is 0.66 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 178503 and 425565 is 283.03 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 221063 and 203545 is 200.41 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 425565 and 403867 is 425.32 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 203545 and 405311 is 399.58 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 405311 and 314339 is 130.00 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The narrowest gap between 407515 and 2521008 is 495.01 m. There is no structure. Do not cross in high flow.
  • Measured crossing. The gap between the parcels either side of this crossing could not be measured from the geometry, which is a reason for more caution, not less.

Following it on the ground No published way to follow

at least 1 hour out and back

at least half an hour there at least half an hour back

10 m up and 20 m down on the way out — so the return leg climbs 20 m.

Walking only — nothing is counted for rest, water, photographs, navigation, or the state of the track.

Naismith's rule, and what it does not account for

No directions are published for this approach. The chain above is a statement about permission, not a path, and turning a run of parcels into "walk north-east for 380 m" would tell you where to walk on evidence nobody holds — including where a way is mapped along it, because what was measured is the chain and not the way. Steps appear here only for a route that follows a surveyed way end to end.

How much climbing Read off the published contour layer

Distance along the route, 0 to 2839.6 m · height 5.0 to 15.0 m Read off 5.0 m contours along the route's own line Official spatial — evidence class
Total climb
10.0 m
Total descent
20.0 m
Steepest sustained
7.8% over 63.9 m
Contour interval
5.0 m
Every height the contours record along this route
Contour crossings along the route, in order, as distance along the route against mapped height
Distance along Height
496.1 m 15.0 m
505.0 m 15.0 m
572.5 m 15.0 m
575.9 m 15.0 m
579.7 m 15.0 m
597.1 m 15.0 m
620.9 m 15.0 m
715.1 m 15.0 m
731.2 m 15.0 m
1067.4 m 15.0 m
1102.0 m 15.0 m
1404.9 m 10.0 m
1407.9 m 10.0 m
1411.3 m 10.0 m
1413.0 m 10.0 m
1484.3 m 10.0 m
1488.8 m 10.0 m
1507.1 m 10.0 m
1568.1 m 10.0 m
1576.1 m 15.0 m
1605.1 m 15.0 m
1625.1 m 10.0 m
1640.0 m 10.0 m
1804.1 m 10.0 m
1826.3 m 10.0 m
1892.2 m 10.0 m
1969.2 m 15.0 m
2115.7 m 15.0 m
2136.2 m 10.0 m
2204.1 m 10.0 m
2210.9 m 10.0 m
2324.1 m 5.0 m
2452.5 m 5.0 m
2610.7 m 5.0 m
2746.1 m 5.0 m
2839.6 m 5.0 m

The profile is the height the contour layer already records, read along the same line the legs above describe. It is not a survey of a path: nothing here says the ground between two contours is even, and a layer of 5.0 m contours cannot evidence a step smaller than the gap between them.

The line on the ground

Map

Route map: 12 legs from Faheys Road East, 2876.8 m in total.

Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.

What this verdict rests on Grades compose to the weakest link

  • The destination sits on the parcel below Official spatial — evidence class

    Parcel 2521008, recorded tenure "Watercourse". Being at the destination and reaching it are separate questions, and this page answers only the second.

    Cadastre and protected-area estate layers Attribution licensed

  • Leg 1: 454065 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    43.8 m at 308.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 454065 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 2: 177591 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    529.6 m at 5.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 177591 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 3: 177553 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    4.5 m at 280.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 177553 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 4: 178503 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    64.6 m at 323.7°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 178503 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 5: 221063 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    344.9 m at 329.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 221063 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 6: 425565 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    234.7 m at 77.4°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 425565 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 7: 203545 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    438.8 m at 39.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 203545 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 8: 403867 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    497.9 m at 43.9°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 403867 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 9: 405311 carries a right of passage Official spatial — evidence class

    20.8 m at 121.9°. Read from the mapped parcel geometry in the official layer, with no inference beyond what the record states.

    Leg reference 405311 Grade official_spatial

  • Leg 10: 407515 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    177.8 m at 127.0°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 407515 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 11: 314339 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    508.2 m at 103.1°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 314339 Grade statutory_inference

  • Leg 12: 2521008 carries a right of passage Statutory inference — evidence class

    11.2 m at 116.2°. The bed is State land by statutory inference from the Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 — law applied to a mapped parcel, not a finding by any authority.

    Leg reference 2521008 Grade statutory_inference

  • The chain is only as strong as its weakest link Statutory inference — evidence class

    Confidence is not an average. It is the weakest class in the chain above, which is why a single inferred leg holds the whole route at statutory inference.

    Composition rule: weakest grade wins Applied at build time

If something goes wrong

Emergency reference — read this to 000

Location
Albany Creek
Lot on plan
2521008
Coordinates
-27.33801, 152.98591 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
Feature
watercourse

What this approach was read from