Tweed Official spatial — evidence class · Tweed · NSW
Blackbutt Lookout
No way in found nothing was proposed as a way in, within the area searched
Access verdict · Unconfirmed · weakest evidence in the chain: statutory inference
Nothing was tested — no starting point was found to test from.
No lawful starting point exists within 2.0 km of this place: no road the public may drive running down a corridor they may stand on, and no trailhead the managing authority publishes. Nothing was refused here, because there was nothing to refuse. The place is published so the gap in the record is visible rather than quietly dropped.
- Lawful, nothing to flag Every leg is ground the public may cross, and nothing about the chain needs a warning. Whether a built track runs along it is said separately.
- Lawful, with caveats A lawful chain with at least one thing about it that has to be said first.
- Unconfirmed No lawful chain could be established from the public record. No route published. This page is here.
- No lawful route Enclosed by land the public has no right to cross. No route published.
On-ground signage and temporary closures override this page. Always.
What this place is A definition, then the record
A waterfall — a step in a watercourse steep enough that the water falls clear of the bed rather than running down it. The step is usually a band of harder rock the creek has been unable to cut through as fast as the softer rock below, so the drop moves slowly upstream over time and leaves a gorge behind it.
No watercourse the register names runs within range of Blackbutt Lookout. The layer maps far more creeks than it has ever named, so that is a gap in the record rather than dry ground.
The point falls inside Border Ranges National Park, designated National Park. Official spatial — evidence class
The point falls outside every World Heritage property the state maps.
The rock at the surface is basalt, mapped as
Hobwee Basalt (Tlh) , oligocene - miocene in age. The survey
describes it as: Olivine basalt
Official spatial — evidence class
The remnant vegetation mapping records no ecosystem over this point. That covers remnant vegetation only, so it is what the register says about ground that has been cleared, or is water, sand or rock — not a statement that nothing grows here.
No register consulted records how far the water falls, and nothing here estimates it. This place is published because a register says it is here, not because a rule found it.
On the record — what the registers actually say Dataset versions in the footer
| Claim | What the record says | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Name | "Blackbutt Lookout" is a gazetted register entry. | Gazetted — evidence class |
| Tenure | Resolved to Protected estate, recorded as "NATIONAL PARK". | Statutory inference — evidence class |
| Parcel | npws-105 | Official spatial — evidence class |
| Council area | This place sits inside Tweed, tested against the boundary that council area publishes. | Official spatial — evidence class |
| Estate | Border Ranges National Park , designated National Park. Declared under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NSW); IUCN category Ib; 31,729 ha as gazetted; no encumbrance recorded. | Official spatial — evidence class |
| Watercourse | No named watercourse in the snapshot runs within range of this point. The layer maps many creeks it has never named. | — |
| Feature | Recorded as a waterfall in the source layer; no terrain rule was needed to find it. | Official spatial — evidence class |
Where it is
Map
Context map for Blackbutt Lookout: parcels, corridors, estate and tracks around the point.
What the colours mean
- Freehold or leasehold — no public access
- National park / protected estate — public land
- Road reserve
- Watercourse
- Track recorded by the managing authority
- Contour, every 10 m of height — nothing is implied about the ground between two of them
- Tenure unresolved — treated as no access
- Where your device says you are, shown only if you press the locate button — read as a rough fix, not a position, and never sent anywhere
- A place with a published approach — the pin is a link to it
- A place with none — every one is listed under the map with its verdict in words
- The walk — the line the legs below describe, not a surveyed path
- The parcels it crosses — the evidence the walk is lawful
- Watercourse crossing — no structure, off in high flow
Names on the map come from the same official records as the rest of the page — road and track names from the cadastre and the access layer, watercourses and estates from their own layers. A feature the record does not name is left unlabelled rather than guessed at.
Sources, licences and dataset versions are listed in the footer of this page.
Every figure the map would draw — parcel references, distances, bearings and the crossing gap — is written out in full on this page, so nothing is only visible on the map. If the map does not load, nothing has been lost.
Is there a track to it No published way within range
No vetted way the managing authority publishes comes within range of this point. That is a fact about the access record, not about the ground: an unmapped pad may well exist, and this site will not invent one on the strength of that.
Approaches — one page each no starting point within 2.0 km
There was nothing to compute
Not one lawful starting point was found within 2.0 km, so no approach was solved and none was refused. The records place this feature beyond every road and trailhead they describe. Publishing that emptiness is the point: it is where the record stops, and it is not a licence to head in on a bearing.
Before you go Published alerts as at the snapshot date in the footer
No alert was published for this area in the snapshot this page was built from. That is not the same as "open": many managing authorities publish no machine-readable status at all, so an absence of alerts is an absence of information.
On Country
No registered cultural heritage party boundary in the published dataset covers this point. That is the state of the dataset, not a statement that no party has an interest here.
A cultural heritage party boundary and a native title claim are different legal things. This page never conflates them, and it publishes neither as a permission.
All land and waters in Queensland carry a duty of care under s.23 of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (Qld) — including here. Cultural heritage site locations are restricted by law (ss.38–46), deliberately, for site protection. This site holds party boundaries only and will never republish site locations. Check the public register and, where in doubt, seek guidance from the Aboriginal party for the area.
Searching a register does not of itself satisfy the duty of care.
Rules here — derived from tenure National Park · statutory inference
This point sits on protected estate. In Queensland that ordinarily means no dogs or pets, no open fires outside provided facilities, no camping outside designated areas, no drones without authority, and nothing taken. These follow from the tenure and the legislation that governs it — they are statutory inference, not a copy of a sign.
Statutes relied on: Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Qld) and its regulations for protected estate; Water Act 2000 (Qld) s.21 for watercourse beds; Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (Qld) ss.23 and 38–46 for the duty of care and for why site locations are never republished here.
If something goes wrong
Emergency reference — read this to 000
- Location
- Blackbutt Lookout, Border Ranges National Park
- Lot on plan
- npws-105
- Coordinates
- -28.43175, 153.13440 (WGS84 / GDA2020)
- Feature
- waterfall
What this page will never do
-
No user pins
Every fact here traces to a government layer or a statute, and each one says which: gazetted, official spatial, or statutory inference. Community records are quarantined and labelled as such. Nothing on this page was dropped on a map by a stranger.
-
No invented lawfulness
Where tenure cannot be confirmed from the public record, the page says so instead of endorsing the route or quietly hiding it. Where no lawful corridor exists at all, none is published — the refusal is the answer.
-
No safety pretence
An access verdict is about tenure, not difficulty or safety. Unmanaged terrain, cliffs and flash flooding are not in the cadastre. The engine reads land records, not the weather.